Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,004
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 965:
Line 965: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:VargasMilan (view source)
Revision as of 13:23, October 25, 2025
, 13:23, October 25, 2025Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by VargasMilan
:::::Tell me, what's the difference between Twitter censorship and 90/l0? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:20, 24 December 2020 (EST)
:::::Tell me, what's the difference between Twitter censorship and 90/l0? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:20, 24 December 2020 (EST)
::::::Twitter censorship is based on political ideology. 90/10 has to do with excessive talking/lack of mainspace contributions. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 17:27, 24 December 2020 (EST)
::::::Twitter censorship is based on political ideology. 90/10 has to do with excessive talking/lack of mainspace contributions. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 17:27, 24 December 2020 (EST)
:::::::Oh, and 90/l0 was not designed to censor political ideology? You need to get a life. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:29, 24 December 2020 (EST)
::::::::We don't need 90/10, we already have anti-[[trolling]] rules which can be applied, technically with appropriate warnings, at 30/70. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 15:37, March 6, 2023 (EST)
::All right, I will accept having it moved if you tell us what a good procedure to follow would be if there ''were'' a crisis of national import which needed to be addressed. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Thursday, 17:21, 24 December 2020 (EST)
::All right, I will accept having it moved if you tell us what a good procedure to follow would be if there ''were'' a crisis of national import which needed to be addressed. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Thursday, 17:21, 24 December 2020 (EST)
:::That we can address in the debate page mainspace. Too bad it's another victory for CP censorship - moving a meaningful discussion from its top ten most view pages to some obscure location on the server. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:27, 24 December 2020 (EST)
:::That we can address in the debate page mainspace. Too bad it's another victory for CP censorship - moving a meaningful discussion from its top ten most view pages to some obscure location on the server. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:27, 24 December 2020 (EST)
::"Wherefore if a case arise wherein the observance of that law would be hurtful to the general welfare, it should not be observed. For instance, suppose that in a besieged city it be an established law that the gates of the city are to be kept closed, this is good for public welfare as a general rule: but, it were to happen that the enemy are in pursuit of certain citizens, who are defenders of the city, it would be a great loss to the city, if the gates were not opened to them: and so in that case the gates ought to be opened, contrary to the letter of the law, in order to maintain the common weal, which the lawgiver had in view."—Thomas Aquinas
:If you are weak in a crisis, you are weak indeed. (Proverbs)
:[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Thursday, 17:33, 24 December 2020 (EST)
::I've been in this position dozens of times in CP - in the midst of an intelligent, meaningful discussion, and some third party comes along, shuts it down, blocks participants, and deletes the discussion. They don't want intelligent debate. No one in the hierarchy will listen to my protests. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 18:10, 24 December 2020 (EST)
==Talk pages==
Please reread:
*[[Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages]]
*[[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Civility]]
Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:03, March 6, 2023 (EST)
:I can't. I'm feeling pretty sick. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Monday, 16:50, March 6, 2023 (EST)
::God bless you. Hopes for a speedy recovery. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 17:01, March 6, 2023 (EST)
:I was feeling sick at the prospect of having to read the articles you asked me to read. My ability to read technical literature waxes and wanes, a good part of the reasons into which I often have no discernment.
:But this causes the kind of vicious circle, or worse, chaotic system, of which I already spoke, where my solicitude to defend persons under time pressure raises my apprehensions while trying to read the literature you asked me to, where there's no certainty of my being able to finish it, as well as apprehensions about adjustments I have to make to my schedule should I fail to complete it, where I would have some need to re-read portions of it as well.
:I will keep trying to build up the mental momentum to read through it, though. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Tuesday, 07:41, March 7, 2023 (EST)
::For simplicity's sake, here's the subsection on Talk pages [https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages#Talk_pages_and_Archiving] from the first link. That, and the Civility clauses. Undoing an Admin's action is a no-no, too. Basically, Main Page Talk is not a Community Portal for shootin' the breeze about whatever topic comes to mind or trashing other users. There is an appropriate place for everything. Usually, the specific article talk page. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:24, March 7, 2023 (EST)
== Great to see you again! ==
Wonderful seeing you again, VargasMilan!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:35, July 19, 2025 (EDT)
:You too, Andy. I hope you're doing well. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 23:46, July 19, 2025 (EDT)
== Thanks for fixing the Scripture verse citation ==
Thanks for fixing the Scripture verse citation on my user page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:15, October 2, 2025 (EDT)
:A pleasure. Also a pleasure to read your works on the faith. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Thursday, 23:20, October 2, 2025 (EDT)