Automoderated users, edit
2,403
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Improvement (view source)
Revision as of 19:16, May 21, 2007
, 19:16, May 21, 2007no edit summary
This page is a good idea. I think the key is to have one, strong resource like this that is ''easy to find'' for editors. I did notice a new welcome template that attempted something like this. Anyway, this page could stay short and concise and have links to in-depth help on how to work each of its subjects, I think. For instance, under linking, make mention of finding "good" links, not just redding up the article. Often a file will not have the name one thinks it will, so one should search for the term first. [[User:Human|Human]] 19:59, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
This page is a good idea. I think the key is to have one, strong resource like this that is ''easy to find'' for editors. I did notice a new welcome template that attempted something like this. Anyway, this page could stay short and concise and have links to in-depth help on how to work each of its subjects, I think. For instance, under linking, make mention of finding "good" links, not just redding up the article. Often a file will not have the name one thinks it will, so one should search for the term first. [[User:Human|Human]] 19:59, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
==Abraham Lincoln==
Why does it need major improvement? It's on the top 14 articles needing improvement. I don't see anything really wrong when I go to the page. I think it should be taken off the list and have another article needing improvement put on instead. [[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 15:16, 21 May 2007 (EDT)