Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte added ,  20:25, December 27, 2020
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
In ''Gill v. Whitford'', 138 S. Ct. 1916 (2018), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] denied a challenge to redistricting in [[Wisconsin]], based on a lack of [[standing]] by the parties who did not even demonstrate that they lived in one of the challenged districts.
+
In ''Gill v. Whitford'', 138 S. Ct. 1916 (2018), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] denied a challenge to redistricting in [[Wisconsin]], based on a lack of [[standing]] by the parties who had not even demonstrated that they lived in one of the challenged districts.
 
[[category:Election law]]
 
[[category:Election law]]
 
[[category:standing]]
 
[[category:standing]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,552

edits

Navigation menu