Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

King's Gambit (view source)

Revision as of 00:30, January 1, 2021

115 bytes added ,  00:30, January 1, 2021
Another recommended response is 2...d5, which can then capture an opponent's pawn it if it first does likewise.
Line 4: Line 4:  
<br>2.f4 ...
 
<br>2.f4 ...
   −
Many players, particularly beginners, accept the gambit but chess experts today advise declining it, such as using a knight to protect the vulnerable pawn (i.e., move Nc6).
+
Many players, particularly beginners, accept the gambit but chess experts today advise declining it, such as using a knight to protect the vulnerable pawn (i.e., move Nc6). Another recommended response is 2...d5, which can then capture an opponent's pawn it if it first does likewise.
    
In [[blitz chess]] gambits can be highly effective in causing the other side to chew up precision time weighing their response.
 
In [[blitz chess]] gambits can be highly effective in causing the other side to chew up precision time weighing their response.
   −
Fascinating debate continues as to whether to accept or decline this gambit, and the Queen's Gambit.
+
Fascinating debate continues as to whether to accept or decline this gambit, and the [[Queen's Gambit]].
    
Notice that black can offer these gambits, too, but it requires more aggressive defense of a weak spot in the board which develops on the side of the gambit.
 
Notice that black can offer these gambits, too, but it requires more aggressive defense of a weak spot in the board which develops on the side of the gambit.
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,620

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1717538"

Navigation menu