Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  22:17, May 21, 2007
m
Line 40: Line 40:  
Greco-Roman sources of the time show little to no interest in the religious movements of the backwater and troublesome Jewish province of Judea, or even the Near East in general.  Perhaps the exception would be Josephus, a Romano-Jewish historian who was interested in recording Jewish history, especially the political conflicts that lead to the military downfall of zealous Jewish nationalistic movements.  Though not centrally concerned with religious developments, Josephus did mention Jesus, and other Christians such as James and the Precursor of the Lord, St. John the Baptist (who may be considered Christian since he accepted Jesus as the Christ, though he would be beheaded long before Jesus’ death and glorification).  Furthermore, other writers do mention Jesus as well, and their passages will be examined below.
 
Greco-Roman sources of the time show little to no interest in the religious movements of the backwater and troublesome Jewish province of Judea, or even the Near East in general.  Perhaps the exception would be Josephus, a Romano-Jewish historian who was interested in recording Jewish history, especially the political conflicts that lead to the military downfall of zealous Jewish nationalistic movements.  Though not centrally concerned with religious developments, Josephus did mention Jesus, and other Christians such as James and the Precursor of the Lord, St. John the Baptist (who may be considered Christian since he accepted Jesus as the Christ, though he would be beheaded long before Jesus’ death and glorification).  Furthermore, other writers do mention Jesus as well, and their passages will be examined below.
   −
The sum total of this material established that Jesus existed, and that he was a significant figure who made a marked religious impact.  His Messianic claims, his reputation and following, his crucifixion, and the controversy between him (and his followers) and the Jewish authorities are all supported by these texts.  Furthermore, it may be that more dramatic occurrences, such as his miracles and even resurrection, and witnessed by Josephus – though these greater claims about the Greco-Roman material are certainly open to debate.  Without a doubt, the best material concerning Jesus remains the gospels and other New Testament texts, as well as the testimony of the Apostolic Fathers.  But these Greco-Roman sources provide important secondary testimony and, even taken alone, are enough to refute the view that Jesus is merely a mythological imagination.
+
The sum total of this material establishes that Jesus existed, and that he was a significant figure who made a marked religious impact.  His Messianic claims, his reputation and following, his crucifixion, and the controversy between him (and his followers) and the Jewish authorities are all supported by these texts.  Furthermore, it may be that more dramatic occurrences, such as his miracles and even resurrection, and witnessed by Josephus – though these greater claims about the Greco-Roman material are certainly open to debate.  Without a doubt, the best material concerning Jesus remains the gospels and other New Testament texts, as well as the testimony of the Apostolic Fathers.  But these Greco-Roman sources provide important secondary testimony and, even taken alone, are enough to refute the view that Jesus is merely a mythological imagination.
    
====Josephus====
 
====Josephus====
97

edits

Navigation menu