Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,828
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
Talk:Electoral Count Act (view source)
Revision as of 02:31, January 5, 2021
, 02:31, January 5, 2021→Confusion
:IMO, none of this will be followed. We're more likely to see something like in the election of 1876, when the Congress did not follow the Constitution at all. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:03, 2 January 2021 (EST)
:IMO, none of this will be followed. We're more likely to see something like in the election of 1876, when the Congress did not follow the Constitution at all. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:03, 2 January 2021 (EST)
::The most glaring provision of the ECA that is unconstitutional is the one that says the state Executive of branch chooses which slate of Electors is valid in the case of dueling electors, rather than the constitutionally mandated sate legislative branch. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:31, 4 January 2021 (EST)