Changes

::::::::So you are saying that you would have believed it when Soviet Union government funded Scientists claimed they have 'disproved' Darwinian evolution?[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 23:36, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

::::::::So you are saying that you would have believed it when Soviet Union government funded Scientists claimed they have 'disproved' Darwinian evolution?[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 23:36, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::::::Considering how many Darwinists they had toi ship off to Siberia to do it?  Maybe not.  Anyway, workign off of your apparent belief that the Government is fundign Global Wamring research for its own insidious ends, what's the Bush-controlled US government's incentive to _support_ the Global Warming Theory? (Especially seeing how George is an oilman himself.) --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 23:50, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::::::Considering how many Darwinists they had to ship off to Siberia to do it?  Maybe not.  Anyway, working off of your apparent belief that the Government is funding Global Warming research for its own insidious ends, what's the Bush-controlled US government's incentive to _support_ the Global Warming Theory? (Especially seeing how George is an oilman himself.) --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 23:50, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::::"equally corrupt", or "equally likely to be corrupt"?  Surely nobody here is claiming that either side is corrupt, merely suggesting that they might be account where the money is coming from.  From that point of view, I would say yes, each side is ''equally likely'' to be corrupt.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:41, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::::"equally corrupt", or "equally likely to be corrupt"?  Surely nobody here is claiming that either side is corrupt, merely suggesting that they might be account where the money is coming from.  From that point of view, I would say yes, each side is ''equally likely'' to be corrupt.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:41, 21 May 2007 (EDT)