Changes

:Looking at the history of this, it's clear that the original intent was to describe Right to Privacy under the Constitution, which (as mentioned above) is cited in what used to be called the "penumbra decisions", with Griswold being generally associated with this line of legal reasoning.  This seems to be a reasonable approach, because "Right to Privacy" is tied to Roe v. Wade, which is generally regarded as part of the "penumbra decisions" (and perhaps the last; I can't think of a later decision described as such).  In the meantime, the "Statutory Law" section should be moved below the discussions and criticisms of the Supreme Court case law. ... Yeah, that seems to work! --[[User:Goldwatergrrl|Goldwatergrrl]]

:Looking at the history of this, it's clear that the original intent was to describe Right to Privacy under the Constitution, which (as mentioned above) is cited in what used to be called the "penumbra decisions", with Griswold being generally associated with this line of legal reasoning.  This seems to be a reasonable approach, because "Right to Privacy" is tied to Roe v. Wade, which is generally regarded as part of the "penumbra decisions" (and perhaps the last; I can't think of a later decision described as such).  In the meantime, the "Statutory Law" section should be moved below the discussions and criticisms of the Supreme Court case law. ... Yeah, that seems to work! --[[User:Goldwatergrrl|Goldwatergrrl]]

::I know I'm a couple years late with this reply, but I still don't understand why the first sentence of this article talks about abortion. Perhaps the "privacy" argument was used in RvW, but that doesn't make the "Right to Privacy" from governments, commercial entities, stalkers, etc. any less real or valuable. Doing quick research, I found no prominent reverences of the "Right to Privacy" being used in regard to abortion, although I don't doubt that it has been. Should this into be re-written to prioritize topics a bit, or am I missing something.

::I know I'm a couple years late with this reply, but I still don't understand why the first sentence of this article talks about abortion. Perhaps the "privacy" argument was used in RvW, but that doesn't make the "Right to Privacy" from governments, commercial entities, stalkers, etc. any less real or valuable. Doing quick research, I found no prominent reverences of the "Right to Privacy" being used in regard to abortion, although I don't doubt that it has been. Should this into be re-written to prioritize topics a bit, or am I missing something. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] ^{([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])} 16:28, 22 January 2021 (EST)