Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:     
3. On the premise, not assessed here, that it has the requisite prurient appeal, is patently offensive, and has only a modicum of social importance, evidence of commercial exploitation of the book for the sake of prurient appeal to the exclusion of all other values.}}
 
3. On the premise, not assessed here, that it has the requisite prurient appeal, is patently offensive, and has only a modicum of social importance, evidence of commercial exploitation of the book for the sake of prurient appeal to the exclusion of all other values.}}
 +
[[File:Williamodouglas.jpg|thumb|right|180px|Douglas, appointed to the Court by [[FDR]], became increasingly liberal in his [[judicial activism]] during his long tenure.]]
      −
[[File:Williamodouglas.jpg|thumb|right|180px|Douglas, appointed to the Court by [[FDR]], became increasingly liberal in his [[judicial activism]] during his long tenure.]]
   
Justice Douglas wrote:<ref name="Memoirs v. Massachusetts text"/>
 
Justice Douglas wrote:<ref name="Memoirs v. Massachusetts text"/>
 
{{cquote|1. Since the First Amendment forbids censorship of expression of ideas not linked with illegal action, Fanny Hill cannot be proscribed. Pp. 383 U. S. 426; 383 U. S. 427-433.
 
{{cquote|1. Since the First Amendment forbids censorship of expression of ideas not linked with illegal action, Fanny Hill cannot be proscribed. Pp. 383 U. S. 426; 383 U. S. 427-433.
SkipCaptcha
35,519

edits

Navigation menu