Changes

While chemistry, Newtonian physics and many other fields belong to science, metaphysics and pseudoscience are not scientific.  

While chemistry, Newtonian physics and many other fields belong to science, metaphysics and pseudoscience are not scientific.  

Karl Popper wrote that Darwinism is "not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme which was at best a possible framework for testable scientific theories."<ref name=StephenEJones>https://web.archive.org/web/20100419000236/http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/PoE/pe05scnc.html</ref> Leading Darwinist and philosopher of science, [[Michael Ruse]] declared with regard to Popper's statement and [[Falsifiability of evolution|the actions he took after making that statement]]: "Since making this claim, Popper himself has modified his position somewhat; but, disclaimers aside, I suspect that even now he does not really believe that Darwinism in its modern form is genuinely falsifiable."<ref name=StephenEJones/> Popper also criticized [[Sigmund Freud]] for being unscientific.

Karl Popper wrote that Darwinism is "not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme which was at best a possible framework for testable scientific theories."<ref name=StephenEJones>Jones, Stephen E. ''Stephen E. Jones Home Page''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20100419000236/http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/PoE/pe05scnc.html]</ref> Leading Darwinist and philosopher of science, [[Michael Ruse]] declared with regard to Popper's statement and [[Falsifiability of evolution|the actions he took after making that statement]]: "Since making this claim, Popper himself has modified his position somewhat; but, disclaimers aside, I suspect that even now he does not really believe that Darwinism in its modern form is genuinely falsifiable."<ref name=StephenEJones/> Popper also criticized [[Sigmund Freud]] for being unscientific.

The issue of the [[Falsifiability of evolution|falsifiability of the evolutionary position]] is a very important issue and although offering a poor cure to the problem that Karl Popper described, committed evolutionists Louis Charles Birch and [[Paul Ehrlich|Paul R. Ehrlich]] stated in the journal ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'':

The issue of the [[Falsifiability of evolution|falsifiability of the evolutionary position]] is a very important issue and although offering a poor cure to the problem that Karl Popper described, committed evolutionists Louis Charles Birch and [[Paul Ehrlich|Paul R. Ehrlich]] stated in the journal ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'':