Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,695
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: − +
Talk:Bourke Hickenlooper (view source)
Revision as of 19:37, February 21, 2021
, 19:37, February 21, 2021→Hickenlooper amendment
:::::In today's world, it would be the same as calling Google and Microsoft operations in China "U.S. property." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:33, 21 February 2021 (EST)
:::::In today's world, it would be the same as calling Google and Microsoft operations in China "U.S. property." [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:33, 21 February 2021 (EST)
:::::When ITT lost its #2 billion investment in Cuba to Castro, it had no recourse to Cuban courts. In the U.S., where ATT was a big employer and taxpayers at all levels of government, it could win an unenforceable judgement against Cuba, but that wasn't enough. Hence the Hickenlooper Amendment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:37, 21 February 2021 (EST)
:::::When ITT lost its $2 billion investment in Cuba to Castro, it had no recourse to Cuban courts. In the U.S., where ATT was a big employer and taxpayers at all levels of government, it could win an unenforceable judgement against Cuba, but that wasn't enough. Hence the Hickenlooper Amendment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:37, 21 February 2021 (EST)