Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,535
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + + + + +
no edit summary
Anyway, there is not need to apologize. I appreciate people looking over my work and catching problems. Thanks for speaking up! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 09:10, 25 January 2016 (EST)
Anyway, there is not need to apologize. I appreciate people looking over my work and catching problems. Thanks for speaking up! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 09:10, 25 January 2016 (EST)
==Example==
This is a good example of gibberish inserted by longterm trolls that essentially confuse and twist the meaning of the article subject into an entirely different direction:
:"Life or death outcomes from decisions about availability or non-availability of health care have been occurring throughout human history. In the United States these decisions ultimately arise from the free market system, both before and since the enactment of [[Obamacare]]. Under [[Obamacare]], there has often been more government bureaucracy involved in the process, but it has always been complex."
Conservapedia, unfortunately, has not effectively policed this type of trolling. And many such nonsensical, seemingly intelligent or coherent statements remain in Conservapedia after many years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:21, 26 February 2021 (EST)