Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
grammar
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''''Conservapedia''''' has often been proven right on a wide range of topics including science, politics, sports, and [[video games]]. In many cases, [[liberals]] pathetically tried to ridicule predictions that subsequently rang true:
+
Hey you. Yeah you. Person that is reading this. Don't you think this is a bit much? Like logically speaking, why would this encyclopedia website have to justify itself with a page like this? Isn't that pathetic and desperate? Also, the fact that the page is not just a link to the Main Page but rather a list of specific instances sort of implies everything not listed here is incorrect, doesn't it? Aren't they admitting that?
−
{| class="wikitable"
+
Now, that paragraph above is assuming you're new to this. If you have answered all my above questions with some form of "liberal media takeover Hollywood elites fake news", this is for you: Genuinely, I hope you have someone in your life that can pull you out of this soon. I know it must not be fun, having this sort of mindset that places you constantly under attack. I would encourage you, just once, to reach out to that annoying liberal family member of yours, and ask them why they believe what they do. You may have more common ground than you think! And hey, if it goes badly, at least you learned more, right? That is why you're here, on this website at least. To learn more.
 +
If anyone else is here pursuing this wild ride as I was, I encourage you to make an account. 
 
|-
 
|-
 
!Date of ''Conservapedia's'' statement
 
!Date of ''Conservapedia's'' statement
1

edit

Navigation menu