Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 80:
Line 80: + +
→Incitement to rioting and violence
After Chauvin was found guilty on all counts,<ref name="Chauvin Guilty">[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/breaking-chauvin-verdict-reached-guilty-2nd-degree-3rd-degree-murder-2nd-degree-manslaughter/ BREAKING: CHAUVIN VERDICT REACHED – GUILTY OF 2ND DEGREE MURDER, 3RD DEGREE MURDER AND 2ND DEGREE MANSLAUGHTER – Guilty on ALL COUNTS!] at the Gateway Pundit</ref> [[Alan Dershowitz]], in an interview with broadcaster Rob Schmitt, said that he believes the verdict could be thrown out on appeal because it had been influenced by the threats made by Waters;<ref>[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/must-assume-jury-heard-maxine-waters-said-case-may-reversed-alan-dershowitz-weighs-chauvin-verdict-video/ “We Must Assume the Jury Heard what Maxine Waters said – The Case May Very Well Be Reversed” – Alan Dershowitz Weighs in on Chauvin Verdict] at the Gateway Pundit</ref> also, Judge Cahill had told Nelson that Waters' interference in the trial via her comments may be cause for a retrial.<ref name="Chauvin Guilty"/> After being excused for her illegal actions by the Democrats, Waters then attacked Judge Cahill during an interview with CNN hack [[Jim Acosta]], refusing to take responsibility for her comments and denying that they were intended to invoke violence, despite subsequent events proving otherwise.<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/04/24/maxine-waters-chauvin-trial-judge-way-off-track-with-appeal-remarks-he-knows-that-there-was-no-interference-with-the-jurors/ Maxine Waters: Chauvin Trial Judge ‘Way Off Track’ with Appeal Remarks — ‘He Knows That There Was No Interference with the Jurors’] at Brietbart</ref>
After Chauvin was found guilty on all counts,<ref name="Chauvin Guilty">[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/breaking-chauvin-verdict-reached-guilty-2nd-degree-3rd-degree-murder-2nd-degree-manslaughter/ BREAKING: CHAUVIN VERDICT REACHED – GUILTY OF 2ND DEGREE MURDER, 3RD DEGREE MURDER AND 2ND DEGREE MANSLAUGHTER – Guilty on ALL COUNTS!] at the Gateway Pundit</ref> [[Alan Dershowitz]], in an interview with broadcaster Rob Schmitt, said that he believes the verdict could be thrown out on appeal because it had been influenced by the threats made by Waters;<ref>[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/must-assume-jury-heard-maxine-waters-said-case-may-reversed-alan-dershowitz-weighs-chauvin-verdict-video/ “We Must Assume the Jury Heard what Maxine Waters said – The Case May Very Well Be Reversed” – Alan Dershowitz Weighs in on Chauvin Verdict] at the Gateway Pundit</ref> also, Judge Cahill had told Nelson that Waters' interference in the trial via her comments may be cause for a retrial.<ref name="Chauvin Guilty"/> After being excused for her illegal actions by the Democrats, Waters then attacked Judge Cahill during an interview with CNN hack [[Jim Acosta]], refusing to take responsibility for her comments and denying that they were intended to invoke violence, despite subsequent events proving otherwise.<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/04/24/maxine-waters-chauvin-trial-judge-way-off-track-with-appeal-remarks-he-knows-that-there-was-no-interference-with-the-jurors/ Maxine Waters: Chauvin Trial Judge ‘Way Off Track’ with Appeal Remarks — ‘He Knows That There Was No Interference with the Jurors’] at Brietbart</ref>
This was not the first time she had previously been involved in stoking up a riot, as she previously advocated in 2018 that her followers harass any businesses and restaurants that support Donald Trump, and also gave a speech during the infamous 1992 Los Angeles Riots that strongly implied that she condoned the rioters' destructive actions over the results of the trial.<ref>https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1384217591011446797</ref>
==References==
==References==