Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 887:
Line 887: + +
→Look at this trolling edit
:::::::Here is the [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop list of CP Admin.] If anyone of these Admins uses the Revert button, i.e., not "Undo", you are free to ask on the talk page of that same article why. Simple rule: Do Not Undo a Revert. Secondly, Undoing an 'Undo' without discussion on talk page is initiating an edit war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup>
:::::::Here is the [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop list of CP Admin.] If anyone of these Admins uses the Revert button, i.e., not "Undo", you are free to ask on the talk page of that same article why. Simple rule: Do Not Undo a Revert. Secondly, Undoing an 'Undo' without discussion on talk page is initiating an edit war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup>
::::::::I still don't buy it. On Simpsons Wiki, we had an admin outright vandalize the entire wiki due to throwing a fit, basically changing it to claim it dealt with AIDS. And we also had something similar happen across Wikia at the time when some admin jerks at the Mass Effect Wiki decided to vandalize whole Wiki sites enmasse. If anything, stuff like that is one reason a rule of not reverting an Admin shouldn't exist. Let's suppose I were a CP Admin, and I decided to vandalize a page thinking as an admin, I could do so. Would you follow the rule and avoid reverting my edit under any circumstances, or would you do whatever it takes to stop vandalism? Me? I'd probably do whatever it takes to restore edits and undo vandalism, even if said vandalism was done by an admin. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 20:12, 2 May 2021 (EDT)