nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: + +
→"Witchcraft" article content: Subjective?
Yes, just be sure to put the Bible-oriented point of view in *first*- considering this IS Conservapedia after all- but both part´s lenght should be about the same, as to not discriminate between either point of view. A subtle (or not-so subtle) conservative bias is OK, as long as there IS another point of view present, too. Thus, the reader is given several points of view, and they can thus construct their own. [[User:FreakyM|FreakyM]] 07:48, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
Yes, just be sure to put the Bible-oriented point of view in *first*- considering this IS Conservapedia after all- but both part´s lenght should be about the same, as to not discriminate between either point of view. A subtle (or not-so subtle) conservative bias is OK, as long as there IS another point of view present, too. Thus, the reader is given several points of view, and they can thus construct their own. [[User:FreakyM|FreakyM]] 07:48, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
:LunarStorm, what makes you think that the "religion-influenced view" is subjective? Surely if the omniscient God has told us that something is the case, you can't get much more objective than that? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:56, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
==Something I Noticed==
==Something I Noticed==