Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,568
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 896:
Line 896: + + + + + + + + +
→Look at this trolling edit
::::::::::I truly fail to see how Gateway Pundit is somehow not valid of a source. It's at least more valid than The New York Times or Washington Post. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 05:22, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
::::::::::I truly fail to see how Gateway Pundit is somehow not valid of a source. It's at least more valid than The New York Times or Washington Post. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 05:22, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
===Analysis===
Let's examine momentarily what Wikipedia says in its Intro to the ''Black Book of Communism'':
:''it was also criticized for comparing Communism to Nazism and accused of historical inaccuracies, manipulations and inflating numbers''
No let's see Wikipedia says in its Intro to ''The Gateway Pundit'':
:''The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[21]''
By wedging a contemporary newsite between two historical and scholarly research works as supposed "corroboration" of the fact of communist democide, we could use any one of thousands of such sources, as well as [[Che Guevara]] T-shirts. Let's call a spade a spade here: this looks like little more than an attempt to discredit ''The Black Book of Communism'' by woke leftists saying, "See, even ''The Gateway Pundit'' claims ''The Black book of Communism'' is true." Not to mention what an insult this is to the intelligence of our conservative readers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:23, 11 May 2021 (EDT)