Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4,664 bytes added ,  23:07, May 22, 2021
partially restore discussion which was wrongfully removed without a proper reason specified
Line 747: Line 747:     
:I realized I said I would be talking to RobS much later, but I changed my mind about this. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:58, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
 
:I realized I said I would be talking to RobS much later, but I changed my mind about this. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:58, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
==  ==
 +
Well, the article is certainly interesting. I can only imagine the reactions by RW users when they see these types of page creations of yours! —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Saturday, 19:07, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
:The no longer allow me to edit their website because I know where are the skeletons are in the atheist closet. Perhaps, my "atheism and ..." articles have created more closet atheists. In addition, when I edit their website and mention things like right-wing populism is increasing in Europe in tandem with the growth of European Muslims and Islamic terrorist attacks, it causes them consternation. The thought that Europe is becoming more desecularized and right-wing and that Muslim terrorist attacks are increasing in Europe is too much for them to bear.Conservative (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
::I'm not sure why they remove your posts regarding extremist far-right violence, seeing that they're already trying to associate the political right with terrorism, etc. I think you bring up some important points because the dark side of populism, despite being demonstrated numerous times throughout history, are still ignored by too many today. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Saturday, 19:07, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
:::I am not sure if you ever saw the movie The Exorcist. But when I talk about the societal benefits of Protestantism/Christianity (see: Christianity and social stability and Protestant cultural legacies) at RationalWiki, it is like the scene in The Exorcist where holy water is sprinkled on the demon-possessed girl. The demon-possessed girl screams out, "You keep it away. Ah! It burns! It burns!". The material about the benefits of Christianity/Protestantism is immediately removed. Conservative (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
::::Hmm, I'm not quite familiar with that movie. I think Bongolian mentioned it to me at one point before my LT account there got banned. Also, speaking of getting banned on RW, they haven't yet blocked an obvious sock of mine from yesterday over there. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Saturday, 19:07, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
:::::Here is the scene from The Exorcist: It burns! It burns!.Conservative (talk) 13:52, 16 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
RW is a madhouse. For example, a former RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin recently put threats to cut himself on several user talk pages and cursed out fellow RationalWikians. There are other incidences like this as well. See: Essay: RationalWiki admits it has a weirdo, pansie infestation. Conservative (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
:I believe you're referring to GrammarCommie. I was recently contacted by RW user "Unclescrooge" (reminds me of the Walt Disney Comics I read a long time ago, which my local library sadly purged most of just a few years back) who said that GC apparently blocked him for an entire three months last year over some mere silly stuff. That's "RationalWiki" for you. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Saturday, 19:07, 22 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
::It must be hard to be a RationalWikian. The cognitive dissonance would drive anyone mad after awhile. First, their philosophical worldview was crushed like a tin can by Christian apologists and Connservapedia's atheism articles. And now right-wing populists and Muslims are going to overrun Europe. And perhaps, the Muslims will be driven out of Europe leaving a land full of right-wing populists and Christians.Conservative (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
:::The most amazing thing is the IRS allowing anonymous sockpuppets outside the United States to serve on non-profit foundation boards. RobSFree Kyle! 14:54, 16 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
::::Even within the United States, how do certain states allow the election of anonymous foundation board sockpuppets to a non-profit entity? Seems to me it would meet the definition of a sham entity. It doesn't meet basic disclosure requirements. RobSFree Kyle! 15:03, 16 May 2021 (EDT)
 +
:::::Looks like a for-profit fundraising scam, and not an educational foundation at all. RobSFree Kyle! 15:05, 16 May 2021 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
35,519

edits

Navigation menu