Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 171:
Line 171: + +
Debate:Is President Bush good for America? (view source)
Revision as of 00:57, May 25, 2007
, 00:57, May 25, 2007democracy
::: Excellent point.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:41, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
::: Excellent point.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:41, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
:::: It should also be noted that American strategists predicted that if given the chance, about 85% of Vietnamese voters would have elected Ho Chi Minh as president. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:46, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
:::: It should also be noted that American strategists predicted that if given the chance, about 85% of Vietnamese voters would have elected Ho Chi Minh as president. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:46, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
::::: Yes, that was a problem. Direct democracy does not always produce the best answer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:57, 24 May 2007 (EDT)