Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,797
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 31:
Line 31: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:ChadUser (view source)
Revision as of 15:16, September 23, 2022
, 15:16, September 23, 2022→Are you using a Bot
:It is not. Literally watch any America First Youtube channel, and they get onto Republicans like [[Brian Fitzpatrick]]. Or checkout Columbia Bugle on twitter. [[User:ChadUser|ChadUser]] ([[User talk:ChadUser|talk]]) 18:50, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
:It is not. Literally watch any America First Youtube channel, and they get onto Republicans like [[Brian Fitzpatrick]]. Or checkout Columbia Bugle on twitter. [[User:ChadUser|ChadUser]] ([[User talk:ChadUser|talk]]) 18:50, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
:Look at Breitbart, https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2021/03/19/30-gop-reps-vote-farm-amnesty-govt-supplied-workforce/ They call out Republicans who don't bootlick for Democrats. [[User:ChadUser|ChadUser]] ([[User talk:ChadUser|talk]]) 18:52, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
:There is no America First Caucus. Period. What more needs to be said?
:This appears to be an effort to paint the MAGA movement as an organizing effort akin to [[Obama for America]], [[Organizing for America]], the [[Progressive movement]], the [[Progressive Caucus]], etc.. The Trump movement or MAGA movement or whatever label you wish to assign, simply operates on a different level and frame of reference, which apparently you do not understand [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 18:56, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
There is no Caucus. America First is very much a movement. RINOs just get in the way of it. Do you like Paul Ryan? Do you like Lisa Murkowski? Do you like Mitt Romney? Do you like Brian Fitzpatrick? What difference does it make between a guy like [[Brian Fitzpatrick]] who supports Amnesty and Gun Control, vs a Democrat who also supports those measures. What good does a warmonger like Liz Cheney serve for America, when Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters are also warmongers? What good are Republicans that join the likes of Adam Schiff and Ilhan Omar to impeach Trump? We need people who stand for the agenda of President Trump. We need people who fight against illegal immigration. We need people fighting for a pro-life agenda as well as the second amendment. We don't need people who send us to forever wars. We don't need people who want take away our second amendment. We don't need people who support mass immigration. I am sorry if you don't understand that. [[User:ChadUser|ChadUser]] ([[User talk:ChadUser|talk]]) 19:04, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
:There is no America First Caucus because the elected representatives voted it down. Yet you continue with this organizing categorization scheme that reeks of leftist and intersectional characteristics. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:17, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
:America First is an ideology and a policy. It is nothing about supporting leftism. If I must say it again. America First is very much a movement. RINOs just get in the way of it. Do you like Paul Ryan? Do you like Lisa Murkowski? Do you like Mitt Romney? Do you like Brian Fitzpatrick? What difference does it make between a guy like [[Brian Fitzpatrick]] who supports Amnesty and Gun Control, vs a Democrat who also supports those measures. What good does a warmonger like Liz Cheney serve for America, when Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters are also warmongers? What good are Republicans that join the likes of Adam Schiff and Ilhan Omar to impeach Trump? We need people who stand for the agenda of President Trump. We need people who fight against illegal immigration. We need people fighting for a pro-life agenda as well as the second amendment. We don't need people who send us to forever wars. We don't need people who want take away our second amendment. We don't need people who support mass immigration. I am sorry if you don't understand that. [[User:ChadUser|ChadUser]] ([[User talk:ChadUser|talk]]) 19:19, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
::Yes, and the first element of that ideology is [[free speech]], the right of America First ideologues to differ with each other. You are making no effort whatsoever to emphasize that point, rather you paint them as gun-toting right-wingers who hate immigrants. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:22, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
::No I don't oppose Mass Amnesty is just what is best for America. America First is general umbrella, there can be some differences of opinion, but everybody who values America First support our constitutional rights. They also don't want to put our troops at risk and continue forever wars. They want to reduce immigration to help put the benefit on the American Worker. Don't even think I am letting Democrats off the hook, I literally made an article that encourages voting them out. [[2022 America First Candidates against RINOs and Democrats]]. [[User:ChadUser|ChadUser]] ([[User talk:ChadUser|talk]]) 19:25, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
:::We can go on all day like this. Bottomline: several CP Admins are suspicious of this categorization scheme, and I felt it only fair to warn you before you put more hours into it cause it can disappear in a heartbeat. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:28, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
::You can think what you want but this is actual made to help's Trump's vision and eliminate RINOs. Another user who is a patriot is sharing this information to help Trump's agenda.[[User:ChadUser|ChadUser]] ([[User talk:ChadUser|talk]]) 19:31, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
:::Don't say no one warned you. [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=RobSmith&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:38, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
==Sysop warning==
You apparently [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChadUser&diff=1762720&oldid=1762693 cut n pasted a response] to my good faith efforts to help you save much of your categorization schemes. '''[[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Inappropriate.2Ftrolling_behavior:_Examples|Conservapedia:Guidelines#Inappropriate/trolling behavior: Examples]] ''' defines trolling as:
*'''''Employing <u>redundant arguments</u> intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions.'''''
In the future, please address specific comments, questions, and requests directly, and do not employ redundant arguments. Such behavior is [[trolling]]. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
== Re: I need your help ==
I mean I don't know what to say to this really. Looks like you and him got caught in somewhat of an argument, but at least he allowed you to keep the pages, right? If you think about it, people are more likely to read articles than categories -- the general public, that is. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 23:18, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
==Trolling==
You have been warned on more than one occasion to cease your trolling Categorization schemes. An earlier troll had miscategorized <nowiki>[[:Category:Traitors]] as a subcategory of [[Category:Liberals]], [[Category:Democrats]], and [[Category:Democratic Party]]</nowiki>. [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Traitors&direction=prev&oldid=1763684] Rather than correct the error, you ''added'' more than 30 Republican sitting Congressional Representatives to a Category that previously had only one element, [[Benedict Arnold]], in the 232 year history of the United States Republic, evidently with the intent to defame living persons and elected representatives of the people.
Have a nice day. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 13:20, June 1, 2021 (EDT)
== You were told to stop adding a lot of thoughtless category tags. ==
You were told to stop adding a lot of thoughtless category tags. For example, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vernon_Jones&curid=158949&diff=1765933&oldid=1762897 this tag] called the Republican [[Vernon Jones]] a DINO (A Democrat in Name Only). It makes no sense. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:42, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
:You now have a 5 year topic ban of adding anymore category tags. You are forbidden to add any more category tags for 5 years. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:51, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
::Xi Jinping a leftwing populist? That's interesting, considering nobody elected him. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 16:56, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
:::Why do we have a White Supremacy and Black Supremacy categories? I can't help but think somebody here is trying to promote divisiveness. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:25, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
==Are you using a Bot==
? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 12:57, September 22, 2022 (EDT)
@[[User:RobSmith|RobS]] No, I type, fast but I have manually been fixing names so default sort does last name first. 12:57, September 22, 2022 (EDT)
Mick Mulvaney, per pinknews.uk is rabidly anti-LGBT. We need a list of all you sources for [[:Category:Pro-LGBT Republicans]]. There is no information in the article to support you Categorization scheme. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 13:01, September 22, 2022 (EDT)
@[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]
Here you go.
https://twitter.com/MickMulvaney/status/1549550370011201536?s=20&t=TZsg87l3ZBe5-soi9zJwFA
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/47-house-republicans-back-bill-protect-same-sex-marriage
http://onlyinbridgeport.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Freedom-To-Marry-Support.pdf
[[User talk:ChadUser]]
:Perhaps you misunderstood me. Or better yet, I could have made myself more clear. I was speaking of all elements in the category.
:Dumb twitter jokes, or the title of a bill is not evidence of anything. For example, we would not call anyone who voted for the Inflation Reduction Act as being opposed to inflation; or someone who voted against the Violence Against Women Act as being pro-Violence Against Women. In each individual case, more context is needed within the article text. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 11:10, September 23, 2022 (EDT)