Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:  
:::The question is quite simple: As an alternative to Wikipedia, ''why has Conservapedia allowed Wikipedia functionaries to shape its content?'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:37, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
 
:::The question is quite simple: As an alternative to Wikipedia, ''why has Conservapedia allowed Wikipedia functionaries to shape its content?'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:37, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
 
::::Subversive influences on CP evidently have been enabled by the site leadership. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 21:40, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
 
::::Subversive influences on CP evidently have been enabled by the site leadership. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 21:40, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
 +
:::::Well, Ep Poor for example could be regarded as WP functionary, so that criteria is a bit overstated. However back to my main point: I don't beleive this was a good faith contribution by a user who knew what he was doing to sow division and chaos. Sarah Palin is in CP's Top Dozen alltime most Popular pages, yet the categorization scheme is intened as a slur. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:47, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,598

edits

Navigation menu