Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:  
== Prominent cases ==
 
== Prominent cases ==
   −
In ''Fields v. Office of Johnson'', 459 F.3d 1 (2006), the [[D.C. Circuit]] ''[[en banc]]'' narrowed the scope of the Speech or Debate Clause such that it not impeded lawsuits by Capitol staff based on alleged discrimination.
+
In ''Fields v. Office of Johnson'', 459 F.3d 1 (2006), the [[D.C. Circuit]] ''[[en banc]]'' narrowed the scope of the Speech or Debate Clause such that it not impeded lawsuits by Capitol staff based on alleged discrimination:
 +
{{cquote|Legislative immunity under the Speech or Debate Clause is limited to matters that are part of, or integral to, the due functioning of the legislative process. It is  [*13]  [**44]  not enough that a Member's conduct is within the outer perimeter of the legislative process. Cf. Brewster, 408 U.S. at 513-16, 528.}}
 +
''Fields v. Office of Johnson'', 373 U.S. App. D.C. 32, 43-44, 459 F.3d 1, 12-13 (2006).
 
[[Category:United States Congress]]
 
[[Category:United States Congress]]
 
[[Category:United States Constitution]]
 
[[Category:United States Constitution]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Navigation menu