Changes

==Praise of ISIS==

==Praise of ISIS==

In June 2017, Rohrabacher completely destroyed his credibility with one statement, when he responded to the [[Islamic_State|ISIS]] attack on the [[Iran|Iranian]] parliament, which left 17 people dead, with the following:

In June 2017, Rohrabacher completely destroyed his credibility with one statement, when he responded to the [[Islamic_State|ISIS]] attack on the [[Iran|Iranian]] parliament, which left 17 people dead, with the following:

{{cquote|...isn’t a good thing for us to have the United States finally backing up Sunnis who will attack Hezbollah and the Shiite threat to us?}}[https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/337274-gop-lawmaker-wasnt-isis-terror-attack-in-iran-a-good-thing]

{{cquote|...isn’t a good thing for us to have the United States finally backing up Sunnis who will attack Hezbollah and the Shiite threat to us?[https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/337274-gop-lawmaker-wasnt-isis-terror-attack-in-iran-a-good-thing]}}

With that statement, Rohrabacher not only strongly implied that supporting ISIS was in American national interests, but also strongly implied that [[Barack_Hussein_Obama|Barack Obama]] didn't go far enough with his treasonous Middle Eastern policies, which ''included'' covertly supporting ISIS. He also exposed himself as being a ''de facto'' [[Neoconservatism|neocon]], a [[Deep_State|Deep State]] shill, and above all a false [[Patriotism|patriot]]. Furthermore, the fact that he did not face any significant repercussions for that statement demonstrates that many in the [[Washington,_D.C.|Washington]] [[Establishment|establishment]] likely agree with it.

With that statement, Rohrabacher not only strongly implied that supporting ISIS was in American national interests, but also strongly implied that [[Barack_Hussein_Obama|Barack Obama]] didn't go far enough with his treasonous Middle Eastern policies, which ''included'' covertly supporting ISIS. He also exposed himself as being a ''de facto'' [[Neoconservatism|neocon]], a [[Deep_State|Deep State]] shill, and above all a false [[Patriotism|patriot]]. Furthermore, the fact that he did not face any significant repercussions for that statement demonstrates that many in the [[Washington,_D.C.|Washington]] [[Establishment|establishment]] likely agree with it.