4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 101:
Line 101: − +
Cut from Aschlafly's talk page and pasted here: should article introduce/define "pro-life" and "pro-choice?"
How is this not something that should be in Conservapedia? This is something that people should be talking about.
How is this not something that should be in Conservapedia? This is something that people should be talking about.
== Should the article introduce and define the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice?" ==
==Should the article introduce and define the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice?"==
Regarding [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&curid=3937&diff=17574&oldid=17566], whether or not the article uses the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice" I think it makes sense to define both in the article. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:45, 1 March 2007 (EST)
Regarding [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&curid=3937&diff=17574&oldid=17566], whether or not the article uses the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice" I think it makes sense to define both in the article. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:45, 1 March 2007 (EST)