Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,411
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
no edit summary
The biologist [[Michael Behe]] criticized Richard Lenski's claims concerning the significance of his experiment (see: [http://behe.uncommondescent.com/2008/06/multiple-mutations-needed-for-e-coli/ Multiple Mutations Needed for E. Coli] by Michael Behe).
The biologist [[Michael Behe]] criticized Richard Lenski's claims concerning the significance of his experiment (see: [http://behe.uncommondescent.com/2008/06/multiple-mutations-needed-for-e-coli/ Multiple Mutations Needed for E. Coli] by Michael Behe).
Jonathon Witt of the [[Discovery Institute]] indicates that the biologist Dustin Van Hofwegen punctured the evolutionists' claims for Richard Lenski’s long-term evolution experiment (see: [https://evolutionnews.org/2021/06/biologist-dustin-van-hofwegen-punctures-claims-for-lenskis-long-term-evolution-experiment/ Biologist Dustin Van Hofwegen Punctures Claims for Lenski’s Long-Term Evolution Experiment]).
The 2008 paper he co-authored was [[peer review]]ed in [[peer review#Time taken for Peer Review|14 days]], sparking obvious questions <ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review. The statistical analysis in Lenski's paper has been criticized for several serious flaws.<ref>See [[Flaws in Richard Lenski Study]].</ref>
The 2008 paper he co-authored was [[peer review]]ed in [[peer review#Time taken for Peer Review|14 days]], sparking obvious questions <ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review. The statistical analysis in Lenski's paper has been criticized for several serious flaws.<ref>See [[Flaws in Richard Lenski Study]].</ref>