| Line 1,400: |
Line 1,400: |
| | |1964 | | |1964 |
| | |UR | | |UR |
| − | |In one of the greatest motion picture masterpieces of all time, adapted from the novel by Australian-born British author P. L. Travers, a magical nanny is hired to take care of two children, Jane and Michael Banks, while their parents are engaged in their respective duties. Embarking on a series of fantastical adventures with Mary Poppins and her Cockney jack-of-all-trades performer friend, Bert, the siblings try to pass on some of their nanny's cheerful attitude and morals to their preoccupied parents. Also has an early condemnation of feminism, as one of the reasons the mom was preoccupied and why Mary Poppins was ultimately hired to help raise the kids was because the mother attempted to fight for women liberation. In the process, the Banks family become closer and happier together than ever before. ''Mary Poppins'' is cited by many to be [[Walt Disney]]'s crowning achievement. | + | |In one of the greatest motion picture masterpieces of all time, adapted from the novel by Australian-born British author P. L. Travers, a magical nanny is hired to take care of two children, Jane and Michael Banks, while their parents are engaged in their respective duties. Embarking on a series of fantastical adventures with Mary Poppins and her Cockney jack-of-all-trades performer friend, Bert, the siblings try to pass on some of their nanny's cheerful attitude and morals to their preoccupied parents. Also has an early condemnation of feminism, as one of the reasons the mom was preoccupied and why Mary Poppins was ultimately hired to help raise the kids was because the mother attempted to fight for women liberation. In the process, the Banks family become closer and happier together than ever before. ''Mary Poppins'' is cited by many to be [[Walt Disney]]'s crowning achievement. A sequel called ''Mary Poppins Returns'' was released in 2018. |
| | |$677,054,500 | | |$677,054,500 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 2,413: |
Line 2,413: |
| | |2006 | | |2006 |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | |Unlike its second installment, it promotes friendship and family values, and is about overcoming certain hardships. | + | |Lightning McQueen - a racecar competing in champion races - gets lost in the desrt town of Radiator Springs, where he gets to know the locals as well as learn humility. Unlike its second installment, it promotes friendship and family values, and is about overcoming certain hardships. While McQueen initially looks down on the local cars for their more simple ways, he does get to befriend them more and value them, even moving his racing headquarters to Radiator Springs and putting said town on the map. Two sequels were released in 2011 and 2017. |
| | |$462.2 million | | |$462.2 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 2,445: |
Line 2,445: |
| | |1943 | | |1943 |
| | | | | | |
| − | |A Disney animated short (back when Conservatives were still in charge) that showcased the horrors of Nazi Germany and fascism. Alongside ''Education of Death'', it proves that, contrary to claims made by leftists, Walt Disney was never a Nazi supporter. | + | |A Disney animated short (back when Conservatives were still in charge) that showcased the horrors of Nazi Germany and fascism. The ending has Donald Duck being very happy and thankful to still live in America, where he is both safe and free. Alongside ''Education of Death'', it proves that, contrary to claims made by leftists, Walt Disney was never a Nazi supporter. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Dinosaur'' | | |''Dinosaur'' |
| Line 2,577: |
Line 2,577: |
| | |2018 | | |2018 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |Set in the fictional Japanese city Megasaki, Mayor Kobayashi issues a decree that all of the city's dogs - whether they're pets or strays - are to be quarantined and taken to Trash Island until a cure for "dog flu" comes around. The mayor's nephew and ward, Atari, heads over to the island to find his dog Spots and is befriended by five dogs (Chief, Rex, King, Boss, and Duke), who all decide to help him find Spots. Along the way, they discover that the mayor has hidden sinister motives behind banning all dogs from Megasaki. The movie condemns totalitarian rule and animal cruelty, the latter shown in the case of Kobayashi's anti-dog propaganda and Gondo's "cannibal" pack, who have been subjected to scientific experiments until an "act of God" rescued them. It also shows family and redemption in a positive light, for Mayor Kobayashi has taken Atari in after his parents were killed and decides to abandon his anti-dog plans once he sees how much Atari has gone through, even donating a kidney once the boy's remaining kidney fails. | + | |Set in the fictional Japanese city Megasaki, Mayor Kobayashi issues a decree that all of the city's dogs - whether they're pets or strays - are to be quarantined and taken to Trash Island until a cure for "dog flu" comes around. The mayor's nephew and ward, Atari, heads over to the island to find his dog Spots and is befriended by five dogs (Chief, Rex, King, Boss, and Duke), who all decide to help him find Spots. Along the way, they discover that the mayor has hidden sinister motives behind banning all dogs from Megasaki. Totalitarian rule is rightfully condemned, with Mayor Kobayashi arranging for the death of a scientist when said man finds a cure for dog flu. The movie also condemns animal cruelty, as shown in the case of Kobayashi's anti-dog propaganda and Gondo's "cannibal" pack, who have been subjected to scientific experiments until an "act of God" rescued them. It also shows family and redemption in a positive light, for Mayor Kobayashi has taken Atari in after his parents were killed and decides to abandon his anti-dog plans once he sees how much Atari has gone through, even donating a kidney once the boy's remaining kidney fails. |
| | |$64.20 million | | |$64.20 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 2,771: |
Line 2,771: |
| | |2017 | | |2017 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |This animated story of the [[The Nativity]] is told from the perspective of anthropomorphic animals. The main protagonist - a donkey named Bo (Boaz for short) - aspires to be a part of the royal caravan crossing through Israel, but he finds a greater purpose: to help carry Mary to Bethlehem. Friendship is also portrayed well, as Bo's best friend - a white dove named Dave - stays by his side; even when he can easily escape from danger like flying away, Dave never leaves Bo to face danger alone. Bo even rescues King Herod's two dogs from a cliff, which results in the two dogs changing from bad to good and vowing to do good. | + | |This animated story of the [[The Nativity]] is told from the perspective of anthropomorphic animals. The main protagonist - a donkey named Bo (Boaz for short) - aspires to be a part of the royal caravan crossing through Israel, but he finds a greater purpose: to help carry Mary to Bethlehem. Friendship is also portrayed well, as Bo's best friend - a white dove named Dave - stays by his side; even when he can easily escape from danger like flying away, Dave never leaves Bo to face danger alone. Bo even rescues King Herod's two dogs from a cliff, which results in the two dogs changing from bad to good and vowing to do good, thus showing that villains in movies can choose to leave their evil ways behind. |
| | |$40,852,824 | | |$40,852,824 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 3,105: |
Line 3,105: |
| | |1942 | | |1942 |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | |Animated adaptation of the German children's book of the same name. Environmental and anti-hunting messages are pushed (although it should be noted that the main antagonist, "Man", is technically closer to a poacher than a true hunter due to his killing a nursing doe and also trying to kill Bambi, a fawn, both of which are strictly prohibited by hunters), but it is also pro-family due to Bambi's mother giving her life to save her son, and the Great Forest Prince, who is heavily implied to be Bambi's father, went out of his way to protect Bambi from the hunter three times, even rescuing his son from a forest fire. It also was anti-homosexual agenda and way ahead of its time in refuting claims of [[animal homosexuality]], as the character Flower, a skunk, is depicted in childhood as a very effeminate male, yet when he became an adult, he evidently was aroused by a female skunk and ultimately became a father as well. | + | |Animated adaptation of the German children's book of the same name; the setting is changed from Europe to Maine, USA for a more familiar audience. Environmental and anti-hunting messages are pushed (although it should be noted that the main antagonist, "Man", is technically closer to a poacher than a true hunter due to his killing a nursing doe and also trying to kill Bambi, a fawn, both of which are strictly prohibited by hunters), but it is also pro-family due to Bambi's mother giving her life to save her son, and the Great Forest Prince, who is heavily implied to be Bambi's father, went out of his way to protect Bambi from the hunter three times, even rescuing his son from a forest fire. It also was anti-homosexual agenda and way ahead of its time in refuting claims of [[animal homosexuality]], as the character Flower, a skunk, is depicted in childhood as a very effeminate male, yet when he became an adult, he evidently was aroused by a female skunk and ultimately became a father as well. |
| | |$102,247,150 | | |$102,247,150 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 3,906: |
Line 3,906: |
| | |2019 | | |2019 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |This photorealistic CGI remake of the 1994 film ''The Lion King'' contains the same messages as the original film, from faith and heroism to honoring one's father. Totalitarian rule is shown as negative in the form of Scar, who makes an alliance with the hyenas to take over the Pride Lands and overhunts alongside them (which is also a condemnation of poaching); this sets him up as an opposite to Mufasa when the latter earlier says, "While others search for what they can take, a true king searches for what he can give." Similarly, the movie expands upon the overhunting element from the original movie by revealing it had been done deliberately on Scar's orders, both to cull the numbers to ensure he remained on top as well as out of spite for Sarabi refusing him, showcasing even more blatantly the negatives of megalomania and such being etched into totalitarian ideologies such as Communism. Hakuna Matata is also a lot more nihilistic in this remake, Timon and Pumbaa explaining how life is a "meaningless line of indifference", until Simba finally manages to shake it off and take responsibility. That being said, the movie suffers from flaws like faces not being expressive enough to several important parts of the original being removed. | + | |This photorealistic CGI remake of the 1994 film ''The Lion King'' contains the same messages as the original film, from faith and heroism to honoring one's father. Totalitarian rule is shown as negative in the form of Scar, who makes an alliance with the hyenas to take over the Pride Lands and overhunts alongside them (which is also a condemnation of poaching); this sets him up as an opposite to Mufasa when the latter earlier says, "While others search for what they can take, a true king searches for what he can give." Similarly, the movie expands upon the overhunting element from the original movie by revealing it had been done deliberately on Scar's orders, both to cull the numbers to ensure he remained on top as well as out of spite for Sarabi refusing him, showcasing even more blatantly the negatives of megalomania and such being etched into totalitarian ideologies such as Communism. Hakuna Matata is also a lot more nihilistic in this remake, Timon and Pumbaa explaining how life is a "meaningless line of indifference", until Simba finally manages to shake it off and take responsibility. That being said, the movie suffers from flaws like faces not being expressive enough to several important parts of the original being removed. A sequel is currently in the works. |
| | |$1,651,825,190 | | |$1,651,825,190 |
| | |- | | |- |