Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
26 bytes added ,  19:04, June 30, 2021
Line 393: Line 393:  
The junta [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives]] believes it has the authority to confiscate, ban and register an entire class of firearms without consulting Congress.  “The [Notice of Proposed Rule Making] proposes amending the definition of the term ‘rifle,’ as contained in 27 CFR §§ 478.11 and 479.11, to ‘clarify that the term “rifle” includes any weapon with a rifled barrel and equipped with an attached ‘stabilizing brace’ that has objective design features and characteristics that indicate that the firearm is designed to be fired from the shoulder, as indicated on ATF Worksheet 4999,” according to a fact sheet about the rule put out by SB Tactical.  “This proposed rule would be the largest [[Executive Branch]] firearms ban/registration scheme in American history— forcing the registration or destruction of millions of privately-owned firearms,” SB Tactical’s fact sheet continues. “[T]he proposed rule would ensure that 99% of the firearms already in circulation are suddenly unlawfully possessed.”<ref>https://www.newstarget.com/2021-06-14-biden-regime-aims-to-ban-register-firearrms.html</ref>
 
The junta [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives]] believes it has the authority to confiscate, ban and register an entire class of firearms without consulting Congress.  “The [Notice of Proposed Rule Making] proposes amending the definition of the term ‘rifle,’ as contained in 27 CFR §§ 478.11 and 479.11, to ‘clarify that the term “rifle” includes any weapon with a rifled barrel and equipped with an attached ‘stabilizing brace’ that has objective design features and characteristics that indicate that the firearm is designed to be fired from the shoulder, as indicated on ATF Worksheet 4999,” according to a fact sheet about the rule put out by SB Tactical.  “This proposed rule would be the largest [[Executive Branch]] firearms ban/registration scheme in American history— forcing the registration or destruction of millions of privately-owned firearms,” SB Tactical’s fact sheet continues. “[T]he proposed rule would ensure that 99% of the firearms already in circulation are suddenly unlawfully possessed.”<ref>https://www.newstarget.com/2021-06-14-biden-regime-aims-to-ban-register-firearrms.html</ref>
   −
A study by Prof. Steven Greene at North Carolina State University of whether motherhood causes women to support more restrictive gun rights found, that while women overall have more liberal attitudes than men on all issues, including gun control, women without children (female non-birthing people) have more liberal attitudes toward restrictive gun rights than mothers do.  The study drew on "2017 Pew Research Center data to explore the ways gender, parenthood, and race intersect to shape attitudes on gun policy in the post-[[Sandy Hook]] era when gun violence has become prominently linked with schools and children, and during a time when the Black Lives Matter movement has drawn national attention to the relationship of gun violence and racial inequality. Most notably, we find that contemporary depictions of mothers as a distinctively pro-gun control constituency are largely inaccurate."  The study concluded that "we fail to see much relationship between race, parenthood, and gun attitudes. Overall, despite common belief and media reporting to the contrary, the story is very much one where parenthood seems to play little role in gun policy attitudes."<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17457289.2020.1862130?journalCode=fbep20</ref>
+
A study by Prof. Steven Greene at North Carolina State University of whether motherhood causes women to support more restrictive gun rights found, that while women overall have more liberal attitudes than men on all issues, including gun control, women without children (female non-birthing people) have more liberal attitudes toward restrictive gun rights than mothers do.  The study drew on "2017 Pew Research Center data to explore the ways gender, parenthood, and race intersect to shape attitudes on gun policy in the post-[[Sandy Hook]] era when gun violence has become prominently linked with schools and children, and during a time when the Black Lives Matter movement has drawn national attention to the relationship of gun violence and racial inequality. Most notably, we find that contemporary depictions of mothers as a distinctively pro-gun control constituency are largely inaccurate."  The study concluded that "we fail to see much relationship between race, parenthood, and gun attitudes. Overall, despite common belief and media reporting to the contrary, the story is very much one where parenthood seems to play little role in gun policy attitudes."<ref>[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17457289.2020.1862130?journalCode=fbep20 tandfonline.com/doi/abs]</ref>
    
In June 2021, Biden proposed expanded background checks for gun purchasers, which presumably would not apply to Hunter Biden who lied on a background check to purchase a firearm.<ref>https://spectatorworld.com/topic/president-biden-strict-gun-laws-household-hunter/</ref>
 
In June 2021, Biden proposed expanded background checks for gun purchasers, which presumably would not apply to Hunter Biden who lied on a background check to purchase a firearm.<ref>https://spectatorworld.com/topic/president-biden-strict-gun-laws-household-hunter/</ref>
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,243

edits

Navigation menu