Changes

{{Caselaw|Bostock v. Clayton County|590 U.S. ___|2020}}

{{Caselaw|Bostock v. Clayton County|590 U.S. ___|2020}}

'''''Bostock v. Clayton County''''' 590 U.S. ___ (2020) was a [[United States Supreme Court]] case that illegally ruled that members of the [[LGBT]] community were "protected" under [[Title VII]] of the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]] through [[judicial activism]].  Tony Perkins calls this decision the "''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' of religious liberty" because of its devastating impact on religious rights.<ref>https://www.frc.org/op-eds/justice-gorsuch-botched-bostock-v-clayton-county-ruling-on-homosexual-and-transgender-rights</ref>

'''''Bostock v. Clayton County''''' (2020) was a [[United States Supreme Court]] case that illegally ruled that members of the [[LGBT]] community were "protected" under [[Title VII]] of the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]] through [[judicial activism]].  Tony Perkins calls this decision the "''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' of religious liberty" because of its devastating impact on religious rights.<ref>https://www.frc.org/op-eds/justice-gorsuch-botched-bostock-v-clayton-county-ruling-on-homosexual-and-transgender-rights</ref>

In this case, justices [[Neil Gorsuch]] and [[John Roberts]] betrayed [[conservatives]] by ruling with the [[liberal]] side of the court to re-write the law, despite the fact that they are not legally authorized to do so.  [[Samuel Alito]], [[Brett Kavanaugh]], and [[Clarence Thomas]] all dissented, citing the fact that [[sexual orientation theory|sexual "orientation"]] was not even mentioned in Title VII at all.  As a result of this unfortunate decision, an employer can no longer terminate an employee due to his or her sexual identity.  This case has been nicknamed the "[[Roe v. Wade]]" of [[homosexual "rights"]] cases,<ref>https://mobile.twitter.com/josh_hammer/status/1272532875204853761?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1272532875204853761%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fnews%2Fsupreme-court-votes-6-3-to-redefine-sex-write-transgenderism-into-1964-law</ref> and it is one of the boldest moves against [[religious liberty]] so far.  Similar to how ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' opened the door to the legalization of [[same-sex "marriage"]], ''Bostock v. Clayton County'' opens the door to religious persecution in the [[United States of America]].

In this case, justices [[Neil Gorsuch]] and [[John Roberts]] betrayed [[conservatives]] by ruling with the [[liberal]] side of the court to re-write the law, despite the fact that they are not legally authorized to do so.  [[Samuel Alito]], [[Brett Kavanaugh]], and [[Clarence Thomas]] all dissented, citing the fact that [[sexual orientation theory|sexual "orientation"]] was not even mentioned in Title VII at all.  As a result of this unfortunate decision, an employer can no longer terminate an employee due to his or her sexual identity.  This case has been nicknamed the "[[Roe v. Wade]]" of [[homosexual "rights"]] cases,<ref>https://mobile.twitter.com/josh_hammer/status/1272532875204853761?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1272532875204853761%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fnews%2Fsupreme-court-votes-6-3-to-redefine-sex-write-transgenderism-into-1964-law</ref> and it is one of the boldest moves against [[religious liberty]] so far.  Similar to how ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' opened the door to the legalization of [[same-sex "marriage"]], ''Bostock v. Clayton County'' opens the door to religious persecution in the [[United States of America]].