97
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 387:
Line 387: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant? (view source)
Revision as of 13:53, May 26, 2007
, 13:53, May 26, 2007→What about the big contradiction?
:::Matthew 5:17-18 (Jesus): Yes
:::Matthew 5:17-18 (Jesus): Yes
:::Romans 6:15 (Paul): No --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 05:24, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Romans 6:15 (Paul): No --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 05:24, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
== Way forward ==
I think this article is good, but needs a clear way forward. First, I think the article should take a stand and argue it; namely, that the Bible is inerrant. That will give focus to what otherwise is at risk of disintegrating. Second, I think we should give so doctrinal statements about this. Protestant confessional creeds have plenty, as do papal and conciliar decrees. Likewise, one may find statements in the Church Fathers, especially Jerome. Thus, the point that certain Christians believe in inerrancy can be suffiently explained. Then the article could move to certain contradictions, though I think perhaps the best way is to list principles for interpretation and understanding the supposed contradictions, since it will not be possible for this article to take on every single accusation made by critics. [[User:Lostcaesar|Lostcaesar]] 09:53, 26 May 2007 (EDT)