Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 395: Line 395:  
::::I'm gradually changing the article so that instead of denying global warming, it is stating that it exists, and the solutions that the right prefers to prevent it, as opposed to the left. I also noted how much China contributes to global warming. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 10:05, July 8, 2021 (EDT)
 
::::I'm gradually changing the article so that instead of denying global warming, it is stating that it exists, and the solutions that the right prefers to prevent it, as opposed to the left. I also noted how much China contributes to global warming. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 10:05, July 8, 2021 (EDT)
 
:::::I think the lead makes it clear why this theory is a lot nonsense. The IPCC predicts a specific amount of warming per decade -- and nothing like that is happening. The 1930s were warm too. You can make the apparent warming disappear if you start the clock in the late 1930s. There was a temperature peak in 2016. Whether the temperature goes up or down, media gets more hysterical every year. When Lindzen was asked make predictions, he'd say there's a third chance it will get warmer, a one third change it will stay the same, and a one third chance it will get cooler. There has been no advance on this front in the last thirty years. Lindzen's prediction is still the best we have. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 04:28, July 9, 2021 (EDT)
 
:::::I think the lead makes it clear why this theory is a lot nonsense. The IPCC predicts a specific amount of warming per decade -- and nothing like that is happening. The 1930s were warm too. You can make the apparent warming disappear if you start the clock in the late 1930s. There was a temperature peak in 2016. Whether the temperature goes up or down, media gets more hysterical every year. When Lindzen was asked make predictions, he'd say there's a third chance it will get warmer, a one third change it will stay the same, and a one third chance it will get cooler. There has been no advance on this front in the last thirty years. Lindzen's prediction is still the best we have. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 04:28, July 9, 2021 (EDT)
−
::::Yes, Peter nails it, again. Just as CRT today is anti-capitalism taught in public schools, so was global warming beginning in the 1980s aimed at destroying the automobile and fossil fuel industry.  The Soviet Union was non-competitive in either. The KGB pushed the theory. When the KGB went out of business in the 1990s, and CIA had no reason to exist either, suddenly the CIA & NASA picked up global warming as a big threat to justify their continued existed and to avoid budget cuts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 10:24, July 9, 2021 (EDT)
+
::::Yes, Peter nails it, again. Just as CRT today is anti-capitalism taught in public schools, so was global warming beginning in the 1980s aimed at destroying the automobile and fossil fuel industry.  The Soviet Union was non-competitive in either. The KGB pushed the theory. When the KGB went out of business in the 1990s, and CIA had no reason to exist either, suddenly the CIA & NASA picked up global warming as a big threat to justify their continued existence and to avoid budget cuts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 10:24, July 9, 2021 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,761

edits

Navigation menu