10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − People can simply make up their minds for themselves, once they have the facts. And there's no problem finding out what "the facts" are. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:59, 26 May 2007 (EDT)+
Conservapedia:Should an encyclopedia simply present readers with the factual evidence on issues? (view source)
Revision as of 18:07, May 26, 2007
, 18:07, May 26, 2007→YES
==YES==
==YES==
Since you don't believe in this side, I'll take it from here. I believe it is insulting to the readership of an encyclopedia to tell them what they should think. Of course there are some situations where it is hard to establish the exact facts, in which case the opinions of authorities on both sides of the issue should be quoted. However the author of an article should not be entitled to include their own personal view, since this undermines the credibility of the whole article. --[[User:Kelpan|Kelpan]] 14:07, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
==NO==
==NO==
Often most of the problem is finding out what the facts are. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:59, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
Often most of the problem is finding out what the facts are. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:59, 26 May 2007 (EDT)