nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: − + + +
Debate:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals? (view source)
Revision as of 19:56, May 26, 2007
, 19:56, May 26, 2007no edit summary
Really? Because there are several satire articles on here. I'd name them, but I'm just a dumb ol liberal. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 15:58, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
Really? Because there are several satire articles on here. I'd name them, but I'm just a dumb ol liberal. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 15:58, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
"Conservapedia is the most reliable and accurate resource for unbiased perspective on all topics covered." How can you say that? All that's here is politics and religion. And how can a website set up to be a conservative encyclopedia claim to be unbiased?
"Conservapedia is the most reliable and accurate resource for unbiased perspective on all topics covered." How can you say that? All that's here is politics and religion. And how can a website set up to be a conservative encyclopedia claim to be unbiased? -LiberalScientificPatriot
If you think that's all we have, then you haven't explored the whole site. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:56, 26 May 2007 (EDT)