| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | #Conservapedia observed the likelihood that [[Jesus]] wrote the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] -- ''see'' [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]] | | #Conservapedia observed the likelihood that [[Jesus]] wrote the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] -- ''see'' [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]] |
| | #Conservapedia observed that "[[Son of Man]]" is a [[liberal]] mistranslation to downplay the divinity of [[Jesus]], and that a stronger, more precise translation would be "The Son as Man" or "The Son, a Man." | | #Conservapedia observed that "[[Son of Man]]" is a [[liberal]] mistranslation to downplay the divinity of [[Jesus]], and that a stronger, more precise translation would be "The Son as Man" or "The Son, a Man." |
| | + | #Conservapedia was the first to observe that the number of new conservative terms [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|doubles by century]]. This ensures that the future will be more [[conservative]], despite [[liberal bias]]. ''See also'' [[Essay:Conservapedia's Law|Conservapedia Law]], which states that the number of conservative insights increases over time at a geometric rate. |
| | <!--#Conservapedia observed that [[pi]] contains [[pi]] and every other number, despite [[liberal denial]] of the breadth and power of [[infinity]].--> | | <!--#Conservapedia observed that [[pi]] contains [[pi]] and every other number, despite [[liberal denial]] of the breadth and power of [[infinity]].--> |
| | #Conservapedia has long observed the implausibility of, and inconsistency in, [[Barack Obama]]'s claims to have converted to Christianity. On September 7, 2008, Obama referred to his "Muslim faith" in a nationally televised interview.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zQK_EhDhZQ][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I] | | #Conservapedia has long observed the implausibility of, and inconsistency in, [[Barack Obama]]'s claims to have converted to Christianity. On September 7, 2008, Obama referred to his "Muslim faith" in a nationally televised interview.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zQK_EhDhZQ][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I] |
| Line 11: |
Line 12: |
| | #Conservapedia first recognized the [[liberal]] push for an [[Affirmative Action President]]. On Feb. 4, 2008, ten days after this entry appeared here, Michael Savage commented that, if elected, [[Barack Obama]] will be the first Affirmative Action President, as he has such a small amount of political (or military) experience.<ref>For example, popular radio commentator [[Michael Savage]] observed, "We have a woman and a multi-ethnic man running for office on the Democrat side. Is this not akin to a -- an affirmative action election? Isn't that why the libs are hysterical, tripping over themselves to say amen and yes to this affirmative election vote?" Savage added, "America's not ready for an affirmative action presidency." [http://mediamatters.org/items/200802040008]</ref> On March 10, 2008, an article is posted on myMaineToday.com entitled, "Are We Ready For An Affirmative Action President?"<ref>http://my.mainetoday.com/story.html?ID=2110</ref> On March 11, 2008, John Harwood published an article on CNBC's website entitled, "Obama: Affirmative Action Candidate?!"<ref>https://www.cnbc.com/id/23579121/</ref> On March 12, 2008, Joseph Farah, founder of Worldnetdaily.com, published a column entitled, "The affirmative-action president."<ref>https://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=58632</ref> | | #Conservapedia first recognized the [[liberal]] push for an [[Affirmative Action President]]. On Feb. 4, 2008, ten days after this entry appeared here, Michael Savage commented that, if elected, [[Barack Obama]] will be the first Affirmative Action President, as he has such a small amount of political (or military) experience.<ref>For example, popular radio commentator [[Michael Savage]] observed, "We have a woman and a multi-ethnic man running for office on the Democrat side. Is this not akin to a -- an affirmative action election? Isn't that why the libs are hysterical, tripping over themselves to say amen and yes to this affirmative election vote?" Savage added, "America's not ready for an affirmative action presidency." [http://mediamatters.org/items/200802040008]</ref> On March 10, 2008, an article is posted on myMaineToday.com entitled, "Are We Ready For An Affirmative Action President?"<ref>http://my.mainetoday.com/story.html?ID=2110</ref> On March 11, 2008, John Harwood published an article on CNBC's website entitled, "Obama: Affirmative Action Candidate?!"<ref>https://www.cnbc.com/id/23579121/</ref> On March 12, 2008, Joseph Farah, founder of Worldnetdaily.com, published a column entitled, "The affirmative-action president."<ref>https://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=58632</ref> |
| | #Conservapedia first recognized the remarkably high correlation between Hollywood figures and plight of breast cancer at a young age, which suggests that their lifestyle plays a role in increasing the likelihood of that tragic disease.<ref>[[Mystery:Young Hollywood Breast Cancer Victims]].</ref> | | #Conservapedia first recognized the remarkably high correlation between Hollywood figures and plight of breast cancer at a young age, which suggests that their lifestyle plays a role in increasing the likelihood of that tragic disease.<ref>[[Mystery:Young Hollywood Breast Cancer Victims]].</ref> |
| − | #Conservapedia first noted that the number of new conservative terms [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|doubles by century]]. What began as a qualitative and approximate observation, developed into a perfect pattern when several Conservapedia editors took the time to explore the topic more carefully. This is a special case of the more general [[Essay:Conservapedia's Law|Conservapedia Law]], which states that the number of conservative insights increases over time at a geometric rate.
| |
| | #Conservapedia has noted that the theory of relativity [[Counterexamples to Relativity|cannot possibly be true]], and has exposed that the theory is highly advocated by liberals who use it to promote moral relativism. In particular, Conservapedia has noted several passages from the Bible that are at odds with relativity, like John 4:46-54. | | #Conservapedia has noted that the theory of relativity [[Counterexamples to Relativity|cannot possibly be true]], and has exposed that the theory is highly advocated by liberals who use it to promote moral relativism. In particular, Conservapedia has noted several passages from the Bible that are at odds with relativity, like John 4:46-54. |
| | #Conservapedia has discovered new instances of [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]]. Not all the entries are Conservapedia originals, but some of them are. Examples include several cases of quantum mechanical knowledge in the Bible: the transformation of water into wine by Jesus may imply that the drink was in a superposition of water state and wine state, and the fact that Jesus appeared before his Apostles in a completely closed room in John 20:26 may be foreshadowing quantum tunnelling. | | #Conservapedia has discovered new instances of [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]]. Not all the entries are Conservapedia originals, but some of them are. Examples include several cases of quantum mechanical knowledge in the Bible: the transformation of water into wine by Jesus may imply that the drink was in a superposition of water state and wine state, and the fact that Jesus appeared before his Apostles in a completely closed room in John 20:26 may be foreshadowing quantum tunnelling. |