Changes

===Biden junta===

===Biden junta===

:{{See also|Biden junta|U.S. Color Revolution}}

:{{See also|Biden junta|U.S. Color Revolution}}

After the junta declared domestic terrorism a top priority, it appointed a domestic terrorist to head the Bureau of Land Management.  Tracy Stone-Manning was aware that she was being investigated in 1989 and again in 1993 when she agreed to an immunity deal with the government to avoid criminal felony prosecution.  Stone-Manning was involved in tree-spiking incidents with the eco-terrorist group [[Earth First!]].  Stone-Manning sent an obscenity-laden letter to the Forset Service warning "we" spoked trees with 500 pounds of spokes.  Tree-spiking is the hammering of a nail or metal rod into a tree trunk, with the deliberate intent to cause death or serious physical harm to logging personnel. When the blade hits the spike, spike fragments like shrapnel.  The immunity deal required Stone-Manning to rat out her fellow terrorists and co-conspirators.  Investigators testified Stone-Manning was involved in planning the tree-spiking incident in the Clearwater National Forest in 1989.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s)/no by-line.--> |title= Clearwater forest trial opens in Idaho tree-spiking case |url=https://lmtribune.com/northwest/clearwater-forest-trial-opens-in-idaho-tree-spiking-case-lawyer-denies-intent-to-harm-anyone/article_33420451-3859-576d-90b7-9a47e6032c9b.html |work=The Lewiston Tribune |agency=Associated Press |date=8 June 1993 |access-date=11 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623192237/https://lmtribune.com/northwest/clearwater-forest-trial-opens-in-idaho-tree-spiking-case-lawyer-denies-intent-to-harm-anyone/article_33420451-3859-576d-90b7-9a47e6032c9b.html |archive-date=23 June 2021 |url-status=live }}</ref>  Stone-Manning lied on her Senate questionnaire denying that she had never been involved in, or under criminal investigation for, tree-spiking. Sen. John Risch said at Stone-Manning's confirmation hearing:

After the junta declared domestic terrorism a top priority, it appointed a domestic terrorist to head the Bureau of Land Management.  Tracy Stone-Manning was aware that she was being investigated in 1989 and again in 1993 when she agreed to an immunity deal with the government to avoid criminal felony prosecution.  Stone-Manning was involved in tree-spiking incidents with the eco-terrorist group [[Earth First!]].  Stone-Manning wrote and sent an obscenity-laden letter to the Forset Service warning "we" spiked trees with 500 pounds of spikes.  Tree-spiking is the hammering of a nail or metal rod into a tree trunk, with the deliberate intent to cause death or serious physical harm to logging personnel. When the blade hits the spike, the spike fragments like shrapnel.  Stone-Manning admitted to writing the letter.  The immunity deal required Stone-Manning to rat out her fellow terrorists and co-conspirators.  Investigators testified Stone-Manning was involved in planning the tree-spiking incident in the Clearwater National Forest in 1989.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s)/no by-line.--> |title= Clearwater forest trial opens in Idaho tree-spiking case |url=https://lmtribune.com/northwest/clearwater-forest-trial-opens-in-idaho-tree-spiking-case-lawyer-denies-intent-to-harm-anyone/article_33420451-3859-576d-90b7-9a47e6032c9b.html |work=The Lewiston Tribune |agency=Associated Press |date=8 June 1993 |access-date=11 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623192237/https://lmtribune.com/northwest/clearwater-forest-trial-opens-in-idaho-tree-spiking-case-lawyer-denies-intent-to-harm-anyone/article_33420451-3859-576d-90b7-9a47e6032c9b.html |archive-date=23 June 2021 |url-status=live }}</ref>  Stone-Manning lied on her Senate questionnaire denying that she had never been involved in, or under criminal investigation for, tree-spiking. Sen. John Risch said at Stone-Manning's confirmation hearing:

{{quotebox-float|"She perjured herself in two ways. One is when she denied having been investigated as the record is absolutely clear she was investigated.  And the second, when she said she did not participate in this tree spiking. This was one of the questions that was asked, 'Did you have personal knowledge of, participate in, or in any way directly or indirectly, support activities associated with the spiking of trees in any forest during your lifetime?' "No." Under oath, "no", "no." Under oath.

{{quotebox-float|"She perjured herself in two ways. One is when she denied having been investigated as the record is absolutely clear she was investigated.  And the second, when she said she did not participate in this tree spiking. This was one of the questions that was asked, 'Did you have personal knowledge of, participate in, or in any way directly or indirectly, support activities associated with the spiking of trees in any forest during your lifetime?' "No." Under oath, "no", "no." Under oath.