Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 125:
Line 125: + + +
→Suggestion: For the second time: same or different?
:: Yes, there are two different types. Essentially the early neo-pagans claimed (and some more recent neo-pagans still claim) to be the same type as described in the Bible but the consensus among historians is that there is at best a very minimal and tenuous connection. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:39, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
:: Yes, there are two different types. Essentially the early neo-pagans claimed (and some more recent neo-pagans still claim) to be the same type as described in the Bible but the consensus among historians is that there is at best a very minimal and tenuous connection. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:39, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
:::Huh? Did you just say that there are two different types, but that one type ''claims'' to be the same as the other? If so, do we treat them as the same? Or do we treat them as different and them call them liars for making a false claim of similarity? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:05, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
I just dislike the opening paragraph as reading rather badly (in terms of language, not intent).
I just dislike the opening paragraph as reading rather badly (in terms of language, not intent).