Changes

<div style="padding-left:40px;">&mdash; Wilhelm Busch<ref name="Busch">{{cite book |title=Jesus our destiny |author=Wilhelm Busch |year=2001 |publisher=Brunen Publishing |place=Basel, Switzerland |page=34 |isbn=0-86347-024-6 |url= }}</ref> </div>

<div style="padding-left:40px;">&mdash; Wilhelm Busch<ref name="Busch">{{cite book |title=Jesus our destiny |author=Wilhelm Busch |year=2001 |publisher=Brunen Publishing |place=Basel, Switzerland |page=34 |isbn=0-86347-024-6 |url= }}</ref> </div>

|}

|}

'''Gleichschaltung''' (meaning ''"coordination"'', ''"making the same"'', ''"bringing into line"'')<ref>{{cite web |title=www.princeton.edu |publisher=https://www.princeton.edu |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Gleichschaltung.html |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> was the [[Nazi]] policy enforcing [[politically correct|political conformity]] in all sectors of society, from the economy and trade associations to the media, culture and education.<ref>{{cite web |title='Only a Phase': How Diplomats Misjudged Hitler's Rise |author=Christoph Strupp |publisher=Spiegel Online International |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/marking-eighty-years-since-hitler-took-power-in-germany-a-880565.html |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> It is an example from the early days of the Nazi [[dictatorship]] of developing its own twisted and distorted language{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"Together with new methods and a new morality they have introduced also a '''new vocabulary''' into Europe."'' Duff Cooper, [[House of Commons]], October 3, 1938 (After [[Munich Agreement]]); See Also [[Disturbed character|Examples: Politics: Peace for our time vs. The first foretaste of a bitter cup]]|group=note}} used to [[psychological manipulation|manipulate]] and confuse citizens of a [[totalitarian]] state so that they no longer can distinguish [[truth]] from [[falsehood]]. Consequently, they are reduced to such a state of confusion{{#tag:ref|cf. "The well-known English author, [[Somerset Maugham]], wrote an important book entitled: ''Of Human Bondage''. How easily men let themselves live in a state of subjection. You older people can remember how you submitted to [[Hitler]]. 'I believed that two multiplied by two made twenty,' many have since admitted. 'I believed it because the [[Führer]] had said so!'"<ref name="Busch">{{cite book |title=Jesus our destiny |author=Wilhelm Busch |year=2001 |publisher=Brunen Publishing |place=Basel, Switzerland |page=34|isbn=0-86347-024-6 |url= }}</ref> |group=note}} and impotence that the dictatorial government can control their hearts and minds. [[George Orwell]]’s famous books [[1984]] and [[Animal Farm]] are the classic fictional and symbolic statements addressing this aspect of totalitarianism.{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Newspeak]]|group=note}} The Ministry of Propaganda established by [[Joseph Goebbels]], best known for his media and social [[Psychological manipulation|manipulation]] in [[Nazi]] [[Germany]],<ref name="Bergman2012">{{cite book |title=Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview: How the Nazi Eugenic Crusade for a Superior Race Caused the Greatest Holocaust in World History |author=Jerry Bergman |publisher=Joshua Press |year=2012 |pages=194–5 |isbn=978-1-894400-49-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K2bFMgEACAAJ |quote=Goebbels...His chief propaganda theory was "the Big Lie": if something is repeated often enough, people will believe it no matter how false. This technique worked very well in disenfranchising Jews.}}</ref> is used as model for the Ministry of Truth in the [[1984|1984 book]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Nazi Gleichschaltung |author=Edgar Feuchtwanger |publisher=The new perspective journal |volume=7 |number= 2 |url=http://www.history-ontheweb.co.uk/concepts/concept72_gleichschaltung.htm |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> Orwell reasoned that if a government could control all media and interpersonal communication while simultaneously forcing citizens to speak in politically controlled jargon, it could blunt independent thinking.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/23/how-the-trans-agenda-seeks-to-redefine-everyone/ |author=Stella Morabito |title=How The Trans-Agenda Seeks To Redefine Everyone |date=24 June 2014  |accessdate=16 April 2016}}</ref> One of the key figures in the process of Gleichschaltung that established the Nazi dictatorship was [[Hermann Göring]], who in 1933 banned all Roman Catholic newspapers in [[Germany]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Hermann Göring, "The Iron Knight" |publisher=www.HolocaustResearchProject.org |url=http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/goering.html |accessdate=5 June 2015  |quote=Georing had joined the Reichstag in 1928, and subsequently became the parliament's president from 1932 to 1933, he was one of the key figures in the process of Gleichschaltung that established the Nazi dictatorship. For example, in 1933 he banned all [[Roman Catholic]] newspapers in Germany, despite the support the Centre Party had given to Hitler's chancellorship.}}</ref> When gleichschaltung is applied into the realms of [[science]], it transforms science into [[scientism]]. The twisted scientific methods and self-serving research are then used to support particular political agenda of the party or [[pressure group]] having special interests.   

'''Gleichschaltung''' (meaning ''"coordination"'', ''"making the same"'', ''"bringing into line"'')<ref>{{cite web |title=www.princeton.edu |publisher=https://www.princeton.edu |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Gleichschaltung.html |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> was the [[Nazi]] policy enforcing [[politically correct|political conformity]] in all sectors of society, from the economy and trade associations to the media, culture and education.<ref>{{cite web |title='Only a Phase': How Diplomats Misjudged Hitler's Rise |author=Christoph Strupp |publisher=Spiegel Online International |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/marking-eighty-years-since-hitler-took-power-in-germany-a-880565.html |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> It is an example from the early days of the Nazi [[dictatorship]] of developing its own twisted and distorted language{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"Together with new methods and a new morality they have introduced also a '''new vocabulary''' into Europe."'' Duff Cooper, [[House of Commons]], October 3, 1938 (After [[Munich Agreement]]); See Also [[Disturbed character|Examples: Politics: Peace for our time vs. The first foretaste of a bitter cup]]|group=note}} used to [[psychological manipulation|manipulate]] and confuse citizens of a [[totalitarian]] state so that they no longer can distinguish [[truth]] from [[falsehood]]. Consequently, they are reduced to such a state of confusion{{#tag:ref|cf. "The well-known English author, [[Somerset Maugham]], wrote an important book entitled: ''Of Human Bondage''. How easily men let themselves live in a state of subjection. You older people can remember how you submitted to [[Hitler]]. 'I believed that two multiplied by two made twenty,' many have since admitted. 'I believed it because the [[Führer]] had said so!'"<ref name="Busch">{{cite book |title=Jesus our destiny |author=Wilhelm Busch |year=2001 |publisher=Brunen Publishing |place=Basel, Switzerland |page=34|isbn=0-86347-024-6 |url= }}</ref> |group=note}} and impotence that the dictatorial government can control their hearts and minds. [[George Orwell]]’s famous books [[1984]] and [[Animal Farm]] are the classic fictional and symbolic statements addressing this aspect of totalitarianism.{{#tag:ref|cf. [[Newspeak]]|group=note}} The Ministry of Propaganda established by [[Joseph Goebbels]], best known for his media and social [[Psychological manipulation|manipulation]] in [[Nazi]] [[Germany]],<ref name="Bergman2012">{{cite book |title=Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview: How the Nazi Eugenic Crusade for a Superior Race Caused the Greatest Holocaust in World History |author=Jerry Bergman |publisher=Joshua Press |year=2012 |pages=194–5 |isbn=978-1-894400-49-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K2bFMgEACAAJ |quote=Goebbels...His chief propaganda theory was "the Big Lie": if something is repeated often enough, people will believe it no matter how false. This technique worked very well in disenfranchising Jews.}}</ref> is used as model for the Ministry of Truth in the [[1984|1984 book]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Nazi Gleichschaltung |author=Edgar Feuchtwanger |publisher=The new perspective journal |volume=7 |number= 2 |url=http://www.history-ontheweb.co.uk/concepts/concept72_gleichschaltung.htm |accessdate=December 6, 2014}}</ref> Orwell reasoned that if a government could control all media and interpersonal communication while simultaneously forcing citizens to speak in politically controlled jargon, it could blunt independent thinking.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/23/how-the-trans-agenda-seeks-to-redefine-everyone/ |author=Stella Morabito |title=How The Trans-Agenda Seeks To Redefine Everyone |date=24 June 2014  |accessdate=16 April 2016}}</ref> One of the key figures in the process of Gleichschaltung that established the Nazi dictatorship was [[Hermann Göring]], who in 1933 banned all Roman Catholic newspapers in [[Germany]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Hermann Göring, "The Iron Knight" |publisher=www.HolocaustResearchProject.org |url=http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/goering.html |accessdate=5 June 2015  |quote=Georing had joined the Reichstag in 1928, and subsequently became the parliament's president from 1932 to 1933, he was one of the key figures in the process of Gleichschaltung that established the Nazi dictatorship. For example, in 1933 he banned all [[Roman Catholic]] newspapers in Germany, despite the support the Centre Party had given to Hitler's chancellorship.}}</ref> When Gleichschaltung is applied into the realms of [[science]], it transforms science into [[scientism]]. The twisted scientific methods and self-serving research are then used to support particular political agenda of the party or [[pressure group]] having special interests.   

==Key figures==

==Key figures==

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>

=== The most frequent terms in LGBTI gleichschaltung ===

=== The most frequent terms in LGBTI Gleichschaltung ===

==== "[[Gay rights]]" ====

==== "[[Gay rights]]" ====

LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2vyqzf |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil rights movement...Sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It is a pattern of behavior.”|accessdate=2 june 2016}}</ref><ref name="FRC2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF07K01.pdf |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sprigg2004">{{cite book |title=Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |place=Washington, D.C. |isbn= 978-08952-60215  |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2HqwAAAAIAAJ |quote=…the Supreme Court has never declared sexual orientation to be a protected class under civil rights laws… }}</ref> This [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]] effort often involves trickery that can be called ''[[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI Bundling]]'', tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In [[Bowers v. Hardwick]], the [[US Supreme Court]] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do,<ref name="William Eskridge">{{cite web |url=http://wtvr.com/2012/05/18/marshall-sodomy-is-not-a-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Marshall: ‘Sodomy is not a civil right’ |author=Wtvrerikaneddenien |publisher=WTVR |date=18 May 2012 |quote=William Eskridge, a Yale Law School professor, has spoken out against Marshall's statement, saying sodomy is, in a practical sense, a civil right--according to the Supreme Court...“The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence that anal or oral sex, commonly known as sodomy, when performed in private by consenting adults, is constitutionally protected -- which makes it a civil right,” Eskridge told MSNBC. |accessdate=2 June 2016}}</ref> a right to engage in sodomitical [[Behavior|conduct]] and argue that it is ''"deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition"'' or ''"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"'', is, at best, facetious. The [[U.S. Constitution]] does not confer a fundamental right upon [[homosexuals]] to engage in sodomy.

LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2vyqzf |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil rights movement...Sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It is a pattern of behavior.”|accessdate=2 june 2016}}</ref><ref name="FRC2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF07K01.pdf |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sprigg2004">{{cite book |title=Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |place=Washington, D.C. |isbn= 978-08952-60215  |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2HqwAAAAIAAJ |quote=…the Supreme Court has never declared sexual orientation to be a protected class under civil rights laws… }}</ref> This [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]] effort often involves trickery that can be called ''[[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI Bundling]]'', tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In [[Bowers v. Hardwick]], the [[US Supreme Court]] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do,<ref name="William Eskridge">{{cite web |url=http://wtvr.com/2012/05/18/marshall-sodomy-is-not-a-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Marshall: ‘Sodomy is not a civil right’ |author=Wtvrerikaneddenien |publisher=WTVR |date=18 May 2012 |quote=William Eskridge, a Yale Law School professor, has spoken out against Marshall's statement, saying sodomy is, in a practical sense, a civil right--according to the Supreme Court...“The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence that anal or oral sex, commonly known as sodomy, when performed in private by consenting adults, is constitutionally protected -- which makes it a civil right,” Eskridge told MSNBC. |accessdate=2 June 2016}}</ref> a right to engage in sodomitical [[Behavior|conduct]] and argue that it is ''"deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition"'' or ''"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"'', is, at best, facetious. The [[U.S. Constitution]] does not confer a fundamental right upon [[homosexuals]] to engage in sodomy.

*Smith maintains that it can be regarded as a form of defence mechanism, a sort of [[psychological manipulation|guilt-shifting trickery]] which is adopted immediately when initiator of this label comes short of arguments thus tries to sabotage any rational discourse<ref name="Smith1993">{{cite book |title=Sodom's second coming |author=Frank LaGard Smith |publisher=Harvest House Publishers|place=Eugene, Oregon |year=1993 |pages=29 |isbn=978-15650-71544 |url=https://books.google.com/books?redir_esc=y&id=G-U4b1FqhygC |quote=the page number is from 2004 Czech translation}}</ref>  

*Smith maintains that it can be regarded as a form of defence mechanism, a sort of [[psychological manipulation|guilt-shifting trickery]] which is adopted immediately when initiator of this label comes short of arguments thus tries to sabotage any rational discourse<ref name="Smith1993">{{cite book |title=Sodom's second coming |author=Frank LaGard Smith |publisher=Harvest House Publishers|place=Eugene, Oregon |year=1993 |pages=29 |isbn=978-15650-71544 |url=https://books.google.com/books?redir_esc=y&id=G-U4b1FqhygC |quote=the page number is from 2004 Czech translation}}</ref>  

When any expression of opposition to homosexuality alias sodomy draws the accusation that one is a mentally-ill bigot equivalent to a racist, few people will venture to express their opposition to sodomical lifestyle publicly. Those who still will do, will also tend to be defensive, offering the disclaimer that they are not hateful, thus unintentionally but implicitly validating the lie that hatefulness and not valid objections is the general rule. The solution countering this LGBTI gleichschaltung is to reject the term “homophobia” itself as harmful and illegitimate. Its illegitimacy can be exposed by making the "gay" sophists define the term with emphasis on the distinction between "homophobia" and non-homophobic opposition to sodomical lifestyle based on presenting valid arguments, such as, for example, scientific [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style|thought experiments]]. They will reveal that they accept no opposition to their agenda as legitimate.{{#tag:ref|The “gays” outrageous mistreatment of Miss California 2009, [[Carrie Prejean]], for simply giving her opinion that [[marriage]] should be between a man and a woman is illustrative of this fact.|group=note}}

When any expression of opposition to homosexuality alias sodomy draws the accusation that one is a mentally-ill bigot equivalent to a racist, few people will venture to express their opposition to sodomical lifestyle publicly. Those who still will do, will also tend to be defensive, offering the disclaimer that they are not hateful, thus unintentionally but implicitly validating the lie that hatefulness and not valid objections is the general rule. The solution countering this LGBTI Gleichschaltung is to reject the term “homophobia” itself as harmful and illegitimate. Its illegitimacy can be exposed by making the "gay" sophists define the term with emphasis on the distinction between "homophobia" and non-homophobic opposition to sodomical lifestyle based on presenting valid arguments, such as, for example, scientific [[Gedankenexperiment#Marriage vs. Homosexual Life-style|thought experiments]]. They will reveal that they accept no opposition to their agenda as legitimate.{{#tag:ref|The “gays” outrageous mistreatment of Miss California 2009, [[Carrie Prejean]], for simply giving her opinion that [[marriage]] should be between a man and a woman is illustrative of this fact.|group=note}}

==== Heterosexism ====

==== Heterosexism ====