Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 484:
Line 484: +
Conservapedia talk:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 23:00, August 9, 2021
, 23:00, August 9, 2021→Templates/infoboxes
Another note to add is that CP templates and infoboxes are generally more well-designed than those on WP. I've noticed on numerous Wikipedia articles that their templates appear boring and filled with meaningless content. In addition, our templates/infoboxes often use bold and bright colors which stand out and look professional while those on WP use lighter hues which appear bland. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Monday, 18:46, August 9, 2021 (EDT)
Another note to add is that CP templates and infoboxes are generally more well-designed than those on WP. I've noticed on numerous Wikipedia articles that their templates appear boring and filled with meaningless content. In addition, our templates/infoboxes often use bold and bright colors which stand out and look professional while those on WP use lighter hues which appear bland. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Monday, 18:46, August 9, 2021 (EDT)
:You ''are'' being sarcastic: frankly, CP's templates are inferior in most ways to wikipedia's - often, they are just decade-old, unmaintained copies.... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:00, August 9, 2021 (EDT)