Changes

:You ''are'' being sarcastic: frankly, CP's templates are inferior in most ways to wikipedia's - often, they are just decade-old, unmaintained copies.... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:00, August 9, 2021 (EDT)

:You ''are'' being sarcastic: frankly, CP's templates are inferior in most ways to wikipedia's - often, they are just decade-old, unmaintained copies.... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:00, August 9, 2021 (EDT)

::Well, whenever I go skim through WP articles, their templates just appear boring. When reading CP articles, our templates just pop out better and makes one want to examine it closely. There are also some more specific examples: for WP's infobox officeholder template, they don't use lines via <code><nowiki><hr/></nowiki></code> much which make everything look nicer, while we do. CP also has some more variation for infobox templates, namely [[Template:Officeholder]] and [[Template:Infobox person]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!}]]''''' Monday, 19:10, August 9, 2021 (EDT)

::Well, whenever I go skim through WP articles, their templates just appear boring. When reading CP articles, our templates just pop out better and makes one want to examine it closely. There are also some more specific examples: for WP's infobox officeholder template, they don't use lines via <code><nowiki><hr/></nowiki></code> much which make everything look nicer, while we do. CP also has some more variation for infobox templates, namely [[Template:Officeholder]] and [[Template:Infobox person]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!}]]''''' Monday, 19:10, August 9, 2021 (EDT)