1,631
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 49:
Line 49: − +
I realize that WAS english, but the purpose of this encyclopedia is not to send people to the dictionary, it is to explain things in a way that they can understand!
== Criticism ==
== Criticism ==
Baraminology has been criticised for its lack of rigorous testing, its lax use of data and its failure to produce any peer reviewed scientific research. It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionary scientists, but creation scientists view it as a young field still in development and believe that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>. Further, it is often claimed that the stultiloquence of baraminology is rapt in a cocoon of absonous sciomachy rendered as legitimate discourse to obfuscate the ceremonious corrigendum of a sciolistic corypheus.
Baraminology has been criticised for its lack of rigorous testing, its lax use of data and its failure to produce any peer reviewed scientific research. It is regarded as pseudoscience by evolutionary scientists, but creation scientists view it as a young field still in development and believe that criticism can be resolved with further research<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_3/baraminology.htm The Current Status of Baraminology, Todd Charles Wood, CRSQ Vol 43 No 3, December 2006]</ref>.
==Further Information==
==Further Information==