Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,059 bytes added ,  23:59, September 4, 2021
→‎Andrew Schlafly's "Proof by Induction": The flaw in your approach is the denial of the existence of an infinite sequence within an infinite sequence. For example, change pi to a set of ordered numbers and then insert pi into that set of numbers
Line 275: Line 275:  
# pi does NOT contain pi (except for the trivial solution at offset zero)
 
# pi does NOT contain pi (except for the trivial solution at offset zero)
 
Please tell me at which line you stop agreeing with this reasoning, so we can expand this further. [[User:Blavek|Blavek]] ([[User talk:Blavek|talk]]) 19:19, September 4, 2021 (EDT)
 
Please tell me at which line you stop agreeing with this reasoning, so we can expand this further. [[User:Blavek|Blavek]] ([[User talk:Blavek|talk]]) 19:19, September 4, 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Reply in bold:
 +
:# pi contains pi after an infinite number of digits into it - '''YES'''
 +
:# pi will repeat itself after an infinite number of digits into it - '''YES'''
 +
:# pi will repeat itself after an infinite sequence of pi digits - '''YES'''
 +
:# an infinite sequence = a sequence that doesn't finish = a sequence without an end = an endless sequence - '''YES'''
 +
:# pi will repeat itself after an endless sequence of pi digits - '''YES'''
 +
:# pi will not repeat itself before the end of an endless sequence of pi digits - '''NOT SURE ABOUT THIS.'''
 +
:# an endless sequence has no end - '''YES'''
 +
:# pi will not repeat itself - '''NO. A NON SEQUITUR'''
 +
:# pi does NOT contain pi (except for the trivial solution at offset zero) - '''NO. A NON SEQUITUR'''
 +
:The flaw in your approach is the denial of the existence of an infinite sequence within an infinite sequence.  For example, change pi to a set of ordered numbers and then insert pi into that set of numbers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 19:59, September 4, 2021 (EDT)
    
===Linking to this section from the article===
 
===Linking to this section from the article===
 
Andy, do you really think that it is  a good idea to link to the above section '''on a talk-page''' from the main article on [[pi|π]]? And please, read the discussion! (ups, that was the second sentence of this paragraph - you probably already started skipping...) --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 05:23, August 3, 2021 (EDT)
 
Andy, do you really think that it is  a good idea to link to the above section '''on a talk-page''' from the main article on [[pi|π]]? And please, read the discussion! (ups, that was the second sentence of this paragraph - you probably already started skipping...) --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 05:23, August 3, 2021 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,256

edits

Navigation menu