17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: + +
Talk:Atheistic science (view source)
Revision as of 17:55, September 20, 2021
, 17:55, September 20, 2021no edit summary
:The article would highly benefit from more citations, including the reference to the current official position of the Church. Some research works brought intermediate, still questionable conclusions with potentially so nasty social consequences, that asking to interpret with care may be reasonable. But this probably more applies to various forms of scientific racism, abortion and things the like. It is really an explanation required why black holes, wormholes, aliens, dark matter and magnetic butterflies are selected as examples instead or why and how do these theories promote atheism in any way. Most of them belong to pseudoscience; serious scientists do not accept them as proven because of the lack of experimental evidence. Hence while the article may address a real thing, it seems currently completely out of focus. [[User:H22|H22]] ([[User talk:H22|talk]]) 17:04, 16 October 2016 (EDT)
:The article would highly benefit from more citations, including the reference to the current official position of the Church. Some research works brought intermediate, still questionable conclusions with potentially so nasty social consequences, that asking to interpret with care may be reasonable. But this probably more applies to various forms of scientific racism, abortion and things the like. It is really an explanation required why black holes, wormholes, aliens, dark matter and magnetic butterflies are selected as examples instead or why and how do these theories promote atheism in any way. Most of them belong to pseudoscience; serious scientists do not accept them as proven because of the lack of experimental evidence. Hence while the article may address a real thing, it seems currently completely out of focus. [[User:H22|H22]] ([[User talk:H22|talk]]) 17:04, 16 October 2016 (EDT)
"But atheistic science is a futile exercise in circular reasoning, as atheistic assumptions dominate the process." Actually, it is creationist "[[pseudoscience|science]]" that is based off of the assumption that the Bible, a 4,000 year old fairy tale, is true. "Atheistic" (actually not atheistic, since it doesn't start with any assumptions about the existence of gods) science doesn't start with any such assumptions. [[User:ActualSmartPerson|ActualSmartPerson]] ([[User talk:ActualSmartPerson|talk]]) 13:55, September 20, 2021 (EDT)