Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,871
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + + + + +
→RAND Corp. study report
The RAND/USC study makes it clear that all the lockdowns accomplished was to add personal, psychological and economic devastation to the terrible personal and societal toll of illness and death.<ref>https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/jun/30/covid-19-lockdowns-caused-more-deaths-instead-of-r/</ref>
The RAND/USC study makes it clear that all the lockdowns accomplished was to add personal, psychological and economic devastation to the terrible personal and societal toll of illness and death.<ref>https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/jun/30/covid-19-lockdowns-caused-more-deaths-instead-of-r/</ref>
==Social distancing==
Former [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) Commissioner Scott Gottlieb claimed “nobody knows” where the six feet of social distancing separation recommendation came from. On an interview with CBS’s ''[[Face The Nation]]'', Gottlieb indicated the rule was arbitrary and not necessarily based on [[science]]. “Nobody knows where it came from. Most people assume that the six feet of distance, the recommendation for keeping six feet apart, comes out of some old studies related to [[flu]], where droplets don’t travel more than six feet.”
“When it became three feet, the basis for the CDC’s decision to ultimately revise it from six to three feet was a study that they conducted the prior fall [2019],” he explained. “So they changed it in the spring [2020].”<ref>https://thepoliticalinsider.com/former-fda-chief-nobody-knows-where-six-feet-of-social-distancing-requirement-came-from/</ref>
==Affects on children==
==Affects on children==