17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 312:
Line 312: +
Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)
Revision as of 23:24, September 20, 2021
, 23:24, September 20, 2021no edit summary
Read the fucking scientific journal I linked, dumbass, and then you'll know how old the Niagara Falls are and how they were formed. Also, apparently you still don't fucking know what the Great Basin is. [[User:ActualSmartPerson|ActualSmartPerson]] ([[User talk:ActualSmartPerson|talk]]) 13:50, September 20, 2021 (EDT)
Read the fucking scientific journal I linked, dumbass, and then you'll know how old the Niagara Falls are and how they were formed. Also, apparently you still don't fucking know what the Great Basin is. [[User:ActualSmartPerson|ActualSmartPerson]] ([[User talk:ActualSmartPerson|talk]]) 13:50, September 20, 2021 (EDT)
:Nah, don't think so. I generally stick to rational science and argument, and you have utterly failed to convince anyone you are capable to discern what rational science is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:14, September 20, 2021 (EDT)}}
:Nah, don't think so. I generally stick to rational science and argument, and you have utterly failed to convince anyone you are capable to discern what rational science is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:14, September 20, 2021 (EDT)}}
::You do realize that's not a fucking counterargument? Explain the flaws in the methodology of the study I linked if you want to disprove it, dumbass. You do not just fucking dismiss it out of hand because "oh no, it might expose me to new ideas, how horrible!" Under our current understanding of the Earth, we can understand how earthquakes and volcanoes work and where they are likely to appear. What the fuck can your creationist "science" predict? [[User:ActualSmartPerson|ActualSmartPerson]] ([[User talk:ActualSmartPerson|talk]]) 19:24, September 20, 2021 (EDT)
== Really? ==
== Really? ==