Changes

==Political culture==

==Political culture==

 

In more recent years, the [[Republican Party]] has generally dominated Arizona politics and the [[Arizona legislature|state legislature]]. In 2004, President [[George W. Bush]] won the state's ten electoral votes by a margin of 10 percentage points with 55% of the vote, and in 2008 [[John McCain]] won the state with 54% of the vote. Republicans control both chambers of the state legislature. However, Arizona became the first U.S. state to vote against an anti-gay marriage amendment in the 2006 midterm elections. Arizona used to consistently be a solid [[red state]] in presidential elections. However, [[Democrats]] [[Kyrsten Sinema]] and [[Mark Kelly]] flipped Arizona's historically Republican senate seats in 2018 and 2020.  [[Joe Biden]] also won the historic red state in 2020, the first Democrat to do so since [[Bill Clinton]] in 1996 and [[Harry Truman]] in 1948. There is currently an audit going on in Arizona for the 2020 election which is uncovering major [[Democrat_election_fraud#2020_Arizona|voter fraud]].

In more recent years, the [[Republican Party]] has generally dominated Arizona politics and the [[Arizona legislature|state legislature]]. In 2004, President [[George W. Bush]] won the state's ten electoral votes by a margin of 10 percentage points with 55% of the vote, and in 2008 [[John McCain]] won the state with 54% of the vote. Republicans control both chambers of the state legislature. However, Arizona became the first U.S. state to vote against an anti-gay marriage amendment in the 2006 midterm elections. Arizona used to consistently be a solid [[red state]] in presidential elections. However, [[Democrats]] [[Kyrsten Sinema]] and [[Mark Kelly]] flipped Arizona's historically Republican senate seats in 2018 and 2020.  [[Joe Biden]] also won the historic red state in 2020, the first Democrat to do so since [[Bill Clinton]] in 1996 and [[Harry Truman]] in 1948. There is currently an audit going on in Arizona for the 2020 election which is uncovering major [[Democrat_election_fraud#2020_Arizona|voter fraud]].

===2020 presidential election===

===2020 presidential election===

[[File:Screen-Shot-2021-09-20-at-8.16.58-AM-1024x546.png|right|350px|thumb|393,017 voter identities processed in Arizona for the 2020 presidential election did not with the Social Security Administration.<ref>https://rsbnetwork.com/news/nearly-400000-voter-identities-processed-in-arizona-have-no-match-with-social-security-administration/</ref>]]

[[File:Maricopa-audit-6.jpg|right|350px|thumb|The Maricopa County Election Management Systems databases were deleted after they were [[subpoena]]ed by the Arizona Senate.<ref>https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-bombshell-maricopa-co-deleted-entire-2020-election-database-showing-results-tally-and-reporting-days-before-equipment-was-delivered-to-the-audit-this-is-spoilati/</ref>]]

 

On November 16, 2020, Arizona reported a 65.9% voter turnout.  On November 30, 2020, the Secretary of State’s reported 79.9% voter turnout, the highest in the country according to latest aggregated results from Statista.  

On November 16, 2020, Arizona reported a 65.9% voter turnout.  On November 30, 2020, the Secretary of State’s reported 79.9% voter turnout, the highest in the country according to latest aggregated results from Statista.  

There was no proper signature validation of 1.9 million on mail in ballots.<ref>https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/11/what-youve-been-asking-for-a-fairly-complete-list-of-some-of-the-most-significant-claims-of-2020-election-miscounts-errors-or-fraud/</ref>

There was no proper signature validation of 1.9 million on mail in ballots.<ref>https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/11/what-youve-been-asking-for-a-fairly-complete-list-of-some-of-the-most-significant-claims-of-2020-election-miscounts-errors-or-fraud/</ref>

====AZ Ballot destruction and vote switching====

====Ballot destruction and vote switching====

Over 75,000 absentee ballots were reported as unreturned when they were actually returned. These absentee ballots were then either lost or destroyed (consistent with allegations of Trump ballot destruction) and/or were replaced with blank ballots filled out by election workers

Over 75,000 absentee ballots were reported as unreturned when they were actually returned. These absentee ballots were then either lost or destroyed (consistent with allegations of Trump ballot destruction) and/or were replaced with blank ballots filled out by election workers

or other third parties.<ref>In the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, ''[https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Bower-Complaint-AZ.pdf Tyler Bowyer et al v.. Doug Ducey]'', December 2, 2020.</ref>

or other third parties.<ref>In the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, ''[https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Bower-Complaint-AZ.pdf Tyler Bowyer et al v.. Doug Ducey]'', December 2, 2020.</ref>

In cases where ballots were too damaged or illegible to be read by vote tabulation machines, Novus software 6.0.0.0. was used in an attempt to cure or restore the ballots. The system would do so by trying to read the applicable scans of the original rejected ballots. However, as noted in a court “the software was highly inaccurate, and it often flipped the vote....the software would erroneously prefill ‘Biden’ twice as often as it did ‘Trump.’”<ref>https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20417265/ward-v-jackson-complaint-and-petition-for-discovery.pdf</ref>

In cases where ballots were too damaged or illegible to be read by vote tabulation machines, Novus software 6.0.0.0. was used in an attempt to cure or restore the ballots. The system would do so by trying to read the applicable scans of the original rejected ballots. However, as noted in a court “the software was highly inaccurate, and it often flipped the vote....the software would erroneously prefill ‘Biden’ twice as often as it did ‘Trump.’”<ref>https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20417265/ward-v-jackson-complaint-and-petition-for-discovery.pdf</ref>

====AZ Equal protection violations====

====Equal protection violations====

Mail-in voters had up to 5 days to “cure” or “fix” invalid mail-in ballots sent prior to Election Day.  In-person voters in Maricopa County had to deal with poll workers who did not know how to work electronic voting machines properly. This resulted in thousands of in-person votes being marked incorrectly, given provisional ballots, and disregarded rather than cured.

Mail-in voters had up to 5 days to “cure” or “fix” invalid mail-in ballots sent prior to Election Day.  In-person voters in Maricopa County had to deal with poll workers who did not know how to work electronic voting machines properly. This resulted in thousands of in-person votes being marked incorrectly, given provisional ballots, and disregarded rather than cured.

====AZ Facebook funding fraud====

====Facebook funding fraud====

State officers and [[Maricopa County]] Officials failed to enforce the state law against private companies from directing federal election administration, accepting millions of dollars in private grants that gave some voters in the state access to advantages that were unavailable to voters in other parts of the state. These officials also allowed for gaps in the chain of custody of official ballots through the use of “mobile” drop boxes that are stationed in unsupervised public locations, failed to enforce the state law against double voting, and failed to enforce the state law against allowing people to vote using an address where they no longer live.

State officers and [[Maricopa County]] Officials failed to enforce the state law against private companies from directing federal election administration, accepting millions of dollars in private grants that gave some voters in the state access to advantages that were unavailable to voters in other parts of the state. These officials also allowed for gaps in the chain of custody of official ballots through the use of “mobile” drop boxes that are stationed in unsupervised public locations, failed to enforce the state law against double voting, and failed to enforce the state law against allowing people to vote using an address where they no longer live.

counted.<ref>Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa Case No. CV 2020-096490.</ref>

counted.<ref>Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa Case No. CV 2020-096490.</ref>

====AZ Dominion Voting Systems====

====Dominion Voting Systems====

Each [[Democrat party]] candidate was allotted 35,000 votes by rigged election machine before the voting started at 7 AM.

Each [[Democrat party]] candidate was allotted 35,000 votes by rigged election machine before the voting started at 7 AM.

When I asked if this has been tested and how do we know it works, the answer was yes, and has shown success in Arizona judicial-retention elections since 2014, even undetectable in post-audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes in the full potential of total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters."<ref>https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/30/4-takeaways-from-arizonas-election-fraud-hearing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=4-takeaways-from-arizonas-election-fraud-hearing</ref>}}

When I asked if this has been tested and how do we know it works, the answer was yes, and has shown success in Arizona judicial-retention elections since 2014, even undetectable in post-audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes in the full potential of total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters."<ref>https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/30/4-takeaways-from-arizonas-election-fraud-hearing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=4-takeaways-from-arizonas-election-fraud-hearing</ref>}}

According to testimony from an MIT-trained mathematician, Biden may have received a weighted 130% total of Democrat votes in Maricopa County to help him win the state due to an algorithm programmed into the Dominion voting machines.<ref>[https://themichiganstar.com/2020/12/02/mathematician-says-biden-may-havereceived-130-percent-of-the-democrat-vote-in-maricopa-county-arizona/  Heine, Debra,“Mathematician Says Biden May Have Received 130 Percent of the Democrat Vote in Maricopa County, Arizona,]” December 2, 2020.</ref>

According to testimony from an MIT-trained mathematician, Biden may have received a weighted 130% total of Democrat votes in Maricopa County to help him win the state due to an algorithm programmed into the Dominion voting machines.<ref>[https://themichiganstar.com/2020/12/02/mathematician-says-biden-may-havereceived-130-percent-of-the-democrat-vote-in-maricopa-county-arizona/  Heine, Debra,“Mathematician Says Biden May Have Received 130 Percent of the Democrat Vote in Maricopa County, Arizona,]” December 2, 2020.</ref>

== Notable Arizonans ==

== Notable Arizonans ==