Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Our readers should not have to go find a basic biochemistry text to find out whether our article is correct
Line 20: Line 20:  
Secondly, no, I did not mean to launch a personal attack on you. I really think that a lot of contemporary biology is mixed up with evolution advocacy. All I meant was that I need you to sort out what is known (i.e., observed facts) from speculations about how cells and genes "began to act they way they do." You must first describe what they actually do, before you speculate on what natural forces or principles set them up (like a designer would) to start doing what they do.  
 
Secondly, no, I did not mean to launch a personal attack on you. I really think that a lot of contemporary biology is mixed up with evolution advocacy. All I meant was that I need you to sort out what is known (i.e., observed facts) from speculations about how cells and genes "began to act they way they do." You must first describe what they actually do, before you speculate on what natural forces or principles set them up (like a designer would) to start doing what they do.  
   −
Third, we need clear, readily comprehensible articles on [[molecular biology]] and [[biochemistry]]. Have you read anything by [[Michael Behe]]? Try to write as clearly as he does. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:32, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
+
Third, we need clear, readily comprehensible articles on [[molecular biology]] and [[biochemistry]]. Our readers should not have to go find a basic biochemistry text to find out whether our article is correct or misleading. Have you read anything by [[Michael Behe]]? Try to write as clearly as he does. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:32, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu