Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2,541:
Line 2,541: − + Line 2,547:
Line 2,547: − +
Essay:Worst Liberal Movies (view source)
Revision as of 10:27, October 16, 2021
, 10:27, October 16, 2021→Debatable Whether Liberal: Well, that definitely gives me more respect for Wise and Kirk, admitting that Hugo x Djali WAS a mistake and a line that shouldn't be crossed. Also adding in another, more glaring problem with the Hugo bit.
Some mild language is present too (namely the words "damnation" and "eternal damnation").
Some mild language is present too (namely the words "damnation" and "eternal damnation").
Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is explicitly male, which means that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame. However, this should be taken with a grain of salt, because the DVD audio commentary Kirk Wise (co-director), Gary Trousdale (co-director), and Don Hahn (producer) suggest that it's possible that the three gargoyles exist purely in Quasimodo's mind and are in fact split off portions of his own personality created to deal with his loneliness<ref> '''Gary Trousdale:''' We've always operated under the assumption that the gargoyles were kind of figments of Quasimodo's imagination. They didn't really move around, or did they? You know...
Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is explicitly male, which may have meant that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame (and also comes across as extremely hypocritical and blasphemous due to homosexuality being tolerated even less by God than Frollo's lust for Esmerelda, based on God explicitly referring to the concept as an abomination in Leviticus as well as his destroying Sodom and Gomorrah largely because of the practice of homosexuality). However, this should be taken with a grain of salt, because the DVD audio commentary Kirk Wise (co-director), Gary Trousdale (co-director), and Don Hahn (producer) suggest that it's possible that the three gargoyles exist purely in Quasimodo's mind and are in fact split off portions of his own personality created to deal with his loneliness<ref> '''Gary Trousdale:''' We've always operated under the assumption that the gargoyles were kind of figments of Quasimodo's imagination. They didn't really move around, or did they? You know...
'''Kirk Wise:''' Yeah, we like leaving a little bit of a question mark; kind of like Harvey the rabbit or Calvin and Hobbes.
'''Kirk Wise:''' Yeah, we like leaving a little bit of a question mark; kind of like Harvey the rabbit or Calvin and Hobbes.
'''Gary Trousdale:''' They're inanimate when anybody else comes in the room. They don't talk to anybody else, except the goat. So that's here we kind of crossed the line a little bit.
'''Gary Trousdale:''' They're inanimate when anybody else comes in the room. They don't talk to anybody else, except the goat. So that's here we kind of crossed the line a little bit.
'''Kirk Wise:''' We like to keep it a little bit iffy. </ref>. So this matter could have less to do with the liberal agenda and more to do with poor writing. A line that even the directors admit they shouldn't have crossed.
'''Kirk Wise:''' We like to keep it a little bit iffy. </ref>. So this matter could have less to do with the liberal agenda and more to do with poor writing. On a positive note, it is to be noted that the directors admitted that the implication that Hugo lusted after Djali was a line that even the directors admitted they shouldn't have crossed, which is a rarity ''especially'' in today's media where they are all for crossing said line.
|$100,138,851
|$100,138,851
|-
|-