Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 605: Line 605:  
Ophir is a young and black security man.  Perhaps a descendant of converts from the southern Arabian Peninsula, and perhaps from the Atlas Mountains.  But one thing was clear as sun, its black color looked very faded, tattered and stained with evil.
 
Ophir is a young and black security man.  Perhaps a descendant of converts from the southern Arabian Peninsula, and perhaps from the Atlas Mountains.  But one thing was clear as sun, its black color looked very faded, tattered and stained with evil.
   −
The effluent that he poured on the State of Israel was wiped out by Masalha in a statement that "there is no right to exist" for the state of "Z... evil", which deserves, a Nazi like her, to come next time at the gates of its airport with a yellow badge.  And Haaretz found all this worthy of publication.
+
The effluent that he poured on the State of Israel was wiped out by Masalha in a statement that "there is no right to exist" for the state of "Z... evil", which deserves, a Nazi [sic] like her, to come next time at the gates of its airport with a yellow badge.  And Haaretz found all this worthy of publication.
    
When the newspaper's publisher, Amos Schocken, was asked on Twitter if he did not think Masalha's tongue was racist ("his black color looks very faded"), he initially said no, as "indistinguishable from the context", but eventually agreed and admitted that it might make sense.  Of Masalha, who interpreted his experience in the field as racism towards him, was “to respond in racist language to show that racism can be two-way.” In other words, the Haaretz publisher admits that his newspaper gave rise to a racist remark by one of his writers.
 
When the newspaper's publisher, Amos Schocken, was asked on Twitter if he did not think Masalha's tongue was racist ("his black color looks very faded"), he initially said no, as "indistinguishable from the context", but eventually agreed and admitted that it might make sense.  Of Masalha, who interpreted his experience in the field as racism towards him, was “to respond in racist language to show that racism can be two-way.” In other words, the Haaretz publisher admits that his newspaper gave rise to a racist remark by one of his writers.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, Moderators, protect
28,120

edits

Navigation menu