Changes

Fauci was informed on February 1, 2020 that the [[Covid-19]] virus was a [[bioweapon]] manufactured in the WIV laboratory.  As the nation's top health advisor, Fauci did not inform the president of the United States, nor anyone in the [[Department of Health and Human Services]] or the [[Center for Disease Control]]. Fauci's initial reaction was to cover up the fact that he had funded the research that produced the virus,<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2021/06/03/fauci-email-dump-illustrates-a-dismissive-physician-who-rose-to-fame-to-cover-his-own-scandal/</ref> and the fact that the research had not been approved by the oversight board.  Fauci arranged a teleconference with 11 virologists who were recipients of grant money from Fauci outside of government, who then in turn issued papers and statements denying that the virus originated in a laboratory.<ref> https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/14/dr-faucis-emails-tell-the-story-of-panic-lies-and-a-possible-cover-up/</ref>   

Fauci was informed on February 1, 2020 that the [[Covid-19]] virus was a [[bioweapon]] manufactured in the WIV laboratory.  As the nation's top health advisor, Fauci did not inform the president of the United States, nor anyone in the [[Department of Health and Human Services]] or the [[Center for Disease Control]]. Fauci's initial reaction was to cover up the fact that he had funded the research that produced the virus,<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2021/06/03/fauci-email-dump-illustrates-a-dismissive-physician-who-rose-to-fame-to-cover-his-own-scandal/</ref> and the fact that the research had not been approved by the oversight board.  Fauci arranged a teleconference with 11 virologists who were recipients of grant money from Fauci outside of government, who then in turn issued papers and statements denying that the virus originated in a laboratory.<ref> https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/14/dr-faucis-emails-tell-the-story-of-panic-lies-and-a-possible-cover-up/</ref>   

In Congressional testimony,<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/07/20/senator-rand-paul-confronts-a-very-nervous-and-lying-dr-anthony-fauci/</ref> Fauci attempted to parse the term "gain-of-function," and was threatened with [[prosecution]] for lying to Congress.<ref>https://www.viralnigeria.com.ng/rand-paul-to-make-criminal-referral-to-doj-after-accusing-fauci-of-lying-to-congress-regarding-gain-of-function-virus-research/</ref>

According to [[Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.]], Fauci's many atrocities include experiments on children.<ref>

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/beaglegate-fauci-experiments-children/</ref>

[[File:Fauci Film.JPG|right|300px|thumb|The Fauci agitprop film was not well received. [[Rotten Tomatoes]] refused to allow critical reviews.<ref>https://youtu.be/OBbEV8qP4fo</ref>]]

[[File:Fauci Film.JPG|right|300px|thumb|The Fauci agitprop film was not well received. [[Rotten Tomatoes]] refused to allow critical reviews.<ref>https://youtu.be/OBbEV8qP4fo</ref>]]

==Fauci collusion with WIV==

==Fauci collusion with WIV==

[[File:Daszak and Fauci.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Daszak and Fauci]]

[[File:Daszak and Fauci.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Daszak and Fauci]]

===Congressional testimony===

===Congressional testimony===

Dr. Roger Ebright, a professor of chemistry and chemical biology at [[Rutgers University]] and biosafety expert, is contested Fauci’s testimony before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.  Fauci’s claim that “the NIH [National Institutes of Health] has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology [WIV]” is “demonstrably false.”<ref>[https://news.yahoo.com/biosafety-expert-explains-why-fauci-140753796.html Biosafety Expert Explains Why Fauci’s NIH ‘Gain-of-Function’ Testimony Was ‘Demonstrably False’, Yahoo News</ref>  The research can be classified as gain-of-function under a number of different definitions, including those found in two pieces of Department of Health and Human Services guidance on the subject.

In Congressional testimony,<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/07/20/senator-rand-paul-confronts-a-very-nervous-and-lying-dr-anthony-fauci/</ref> Fauci attempted to parse the term "gain-of-function," and was threatened with [[prosecution]] for lying to Congress.<ref>https://www.viralnigeria.com.ng/rand-paul-to-make-criminal-referral-to-doj-after-accusing-fauci-of-lying-to-congress-regarding-gain-of-function-virus-research/</ref>  Dr. Roger Ebright, a professor of chemistry and chemical biology at [[Rutgers University]] and biosafety expert, contested Fauci’s testimony before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.  Fauci’s claim that “the NIH [National Institutes of Health] has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology [WIV]” is “demonstrably false.”<ref>[https://news.yahoo.com/biosafety-expert-explains-why-fauci-140753796.html Biosafety Expert Explains Why Fauci’s NIH ‘Gain-of-Function’ Testimony Was ‘Demonstrably False’, Yahoo News</ref>  The research can be classified as gain-of-function under a number of different definitions, including those found in two pieces of Department of Health and Human Services guidance on the subject.

The work being conducted at the WIV, using NIH funds originally granted to Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, “epitomizes” gain-of-function research under the definition HHS provided in its guidance, and is the exact kind of research that led the Obama administration to conclude that gain-of-function was too dangerous to continue domestically.

The work being conducted at the WIV, using NIH funds originally granted to Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, “epitomizes” gain-of-function research under the definition HHS provided in its guidance, and is the exact kind of research that led the Obama administration to conclude that gain-of-function was too dangerous to continue domestically.