''Snopes'' tries mightily to downplay the achievement and dispel the mystery, but its arguments are inconsequential. For example, it implies that a side connector added later (and visible above) to stop the springiness of the stairs is somehow a support.<ref>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/stairway-from-heaven/</ref> It plainly is not. ''Snopes'' also tries to disparage the original staircase as possibly being unsafe because it lacked a hand-railing, but that obviously misses the point since a hand-railing was trivial to add when desired. The ''Snopes'' analysis concludes with a slap at the private ownership of the chapel, by saying that they somehow have "a strong financial motive" to perpetuate a legend, as though anyone is getting rich off this. | ''Snopes'' tries mightily to downplay the achievement and dispel the mystery, but its arguments are inconsequential. For example, it implies that a side connector added later (and visible above) to stop the springiness of the stairs is somehow a support.<ref>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/stairway-from-heaven/</ref> It plainly is not. ''Snopes'' also tries to disparage the original staircase as possibly being unsafe because it lacked a hand-railing, but that obviously misses the point since a hand-railing was trivial to add when desired. The ''Snopes'' analysis concludes with a slap at the private ownership of the chapel, by saying that they somehow have "a strong financial motive" to perpetuate a legend, as though anyone is getting rich off this. |