SkipCaptcha
1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 527:
Line 527: + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 00:46, November 26, 2021
, 00:46, November 26, 2021→Brought up issue of wikipedia banning conservative sources: new section
I found a good example of leftist bias on Wikipedia on the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amy_Schumer/Archive_1#Dayle23's_edits talk page] mentioned above. Towards the end of the discussion, it becomes obvious that a source quoting comments explicitly made by Schumer is considered to be "editorializing". Meanwhile, quotes from President Trump taken out of context by the same sources is absolutely acceptable. [[User:MAGAViking|MAGAViking]] ([[User talk:MAGAViking|talk]]) 16:47, 18 February 2021 (EST)
I found a good example of leftist bias on Wikipedia on the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amy_Schumer/Archive_1#Dayle23's_edits talk page] mentioned above. Towards the end of the discussion, it becomes obvious that a source quoting comments explicitly made by Schumer is considered to be "editorializing". Meanwhile, quotes from President Trump taken out of context by the same sources is absolutely acceptable. [[User:MAGAViking|MAGAViking]] ([[User talk:MAGAViking|talk]]) 16:47, 18 February 2021 (EST)
== Brought up issue of wikipedia banning conservative sources ==
My understanding is that wikipedia has effectively banned references to any non-liberal newsite, including Fox Nex, the NY Post and the UK's DailyMail. Of course CNN, MSNBc, NYT and the guardian are all okay.
(1) I have not seen this issue addressed before, but it present a large, on-going bias. To me it represents the death-nail of neutrality
in Wikipedia.
(2) Is there any mention of this issue on this site??
(3) When did wikipedia begin banning conservative sites?